13 PORK PROBLEMS

13 PROBLEMS WITH PORK

1) A pig is a real garbage gut. It will eat anything including urine, excrement, dirt, decaying animal flesh, maggots, or decaying vegetables. They will even eat the cancerous growths off other pigs or animals.

2) The meat and fat of a pig absorbs toxins like a sponge. Their meat can be 30 times more toxic than beef or venison.

3) When eating beef or venison, it takes 8 to 9 hours to digest the meat so what little toxins are in the meat are slowly put into our system and can be filtered by the liver. But when pork is eaten, it takes only 4 hours to digest the meat. We thus get a much higher level of toxins within a shorter time.

4) Unlike other mammals, a pig does not sweat or perspire. Perspiration is a means by which toxins are removed from the body. Since a pig does not sweat, the toxins remain within its body and in the meat.

5) Pigs and swine are so poisonous that you can hardly kill them with strychnine or other poisons.

6) Farmers will often pen up pigs within a rattlesnake nest because the pigs will eat the snakes, and if bitten they will not be harmed by the venom.

7) When a pig is butchered, worms and insects take to its flesh sooner and faster than to other animal’s flesh. In a few days the swine flesh is full of worms.

Swine and pigs have over a dozen parasites within them, such as tapeworms, flukes, worms, and trichinae. There is no safe temperature at which pork can be cooked to ensure that all these parasites, their cysts, and eggs will be killed.

9) Pig meat has twice as much fat as beef. A 3 oz T bone steak contains 8.5 grams of fat; a 3 oz pork chop contains 18 grams of fat. A 3 oz beef rib has 11.1 grams of fat; a 3 oz pork spare rib has 23.2 grams of fat.

10) Cows have a complex digestive system, having four stomachs. It thus takes over 24 hours to digest their vegetarian diet causing its food to be purified of toxins. In contrast, the swine’s one stomach takes only about 4 hours to digest its foul diet, turning its toxic food into flesh.

11) The swine carries about 30 diseases which can be easily passed to humans. This is why God commanded that we are not even to touch their carcase (Leviticus 11:8).

12) The trichinae worm of the swine is microscopically small, and once ingested can lodge itself in our intestines, muscles, spinal cord or the brain. This results in the disease trichinosis. The symptoms are sometimes lacking, but when present they are mistaken for other diseases, such as typhoid, arthritis, rheumatism, gastritis, MS, meningitis, gall bladder trouble, or acute alcoholism.

13) The pig is so poisonous and filthy, that nature had to prepare him a sewer line or canal running down each leg with an outlet in the bottom of the foot. Out of this hole oozes pus and filth his body cannot pass into its system fast enough. Some of this pus gets into the meat of the pig.

Ministration of Death

Ministration of Death
*
Let’s examine 2Cor.3:7-14 in sections
*
2Cor.3:7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.
*
ministration of death – ministration of condemnation … ‘written and engraven in stones’
*
Dt.27:2 And it shall be on the day when ye shall pass over Jordan unto the land which YHWH thy Elohim giveth thee, that thou shalt set thee up *great stones* (ie uncarriable boulders), and plaister them with plaister: 3 And thou shalt *write* (ie engraven) upon them all the words of this law, when thou art passed over, that thou mayest go in unto the land which YHWH thy Elohim giveth thee, a land that floweth with milk and honey; as YHWH Elohim of thy fathers hath promised thee. 4 Therefore it shall be when ye be gone over Jordan, that ye shall set up these *stones*, which I command you this day, in mount Ebal, and thou shalt plaister them with plaister.
*
4 contrasted ‘ministration’ positions – ministration of death vs ministration of the spirit – ministration of condemnation vs ministration of righteousness – Death vs Life – Consequence vs Righteousness.
*
I have not been able to find an adequate/concrete definition defining ‘ministration’ as opposed to ‘administration’. The best was – “Apparently by ‘differences of administration’ is meant the distinctive varieties of service and ministration by which things are accomplished in the Church.”
*
However it can be deduced that a ‘minister’ is a person in charge while administer is an action. Be that as it may.
*
Ex.24:12 And YHWH said unto Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there: and I will give thee tables of stone, and a law, and commandments which I have written; that thou mayest teach them.
*
1] (2) table/ts cut from 1 stone; Not 2] table of several stones
*
Ex.31:18 And he gave unto Moses, when he had made an end of communing with him upon mount Sinai, two tables of testimony, tables of stone [portable / carriable ie ‘gave’], written with the finger of [Yah]. – Dt.9:10
*
1] two carriable tables made from 1 stone; is very different than 2] engravings on multiple immovable *great stones* ie boulders. (envision a wayward child writing on a blackboard multiple times – ‘I will not …’)
*
If I remember correctly Rabbinic types claim this (Dt.27:2-4) was done for each of the known 70 languages; that’s a lot of ‘I will not-s …’
*
1] death – G2288 thanatos – death; 2] spirit – G4151 pneuma – spirit; 3] condemnation – G2633 – katakrisis – kat-ak’-ree-sis; 4] righteousness – G1343 dikaiosune – righteousness
*
Condemnation – G2633 – katakrisis – From G2632; sentencing adversely (the act): – condemn (-ation).
*
This ‘ministration of death/condemnation’ was the ‘added law’ (Gal.3:19) for transgression – “which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear” (Act.15:10). For transgressing the Melkizedeq (Marriage-Jer.31:32) Covenant of vowed/agreed to ‘righteousness’. This ‘ministration of death’ was none other than for the ‘mitigation’ of;
*
Ex.32:10 Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them (ie annihilate – including Aaron & Sons): and I will make of thee a great nation.
*
Even tho ‘mitigation’ is not a biblical word; who cannot see that YHWH ‘mitigated’ His initial Ex.32:10 ruling over All Israel of absolute – utter Death?
*
Mitigation [mit-i-gey-shuh n] – 1. the act of mitigating, or lessening the force or intensity of something unpleasant, *as wrath*, pain, grief, or extreme circumstances … 2. the act of making a condition or consequence less severe:
*
It stands to reason that the act of the Mitigation of something ‘unpleasant’ (Death) would require something less egregious which involves ‘mercy’.
*
Now go back and put in ‘The Mitigation of’ instead of ‘the ministration of death/condemnation in 2Cor.3:7-8. This is exactly what YHWH did; He ‘mitigated’ (lessened) his death sentence BUT there would be consequences. The Levitical Priesthood was born (Num.3:12) PLUS the introduction of ‘added law’ (Gal.3:19) – Book of the Law (Gal.3:10)
*
Continuing – 2Cor.3:10 For even **that which was made glorious (the Levitical Priesthood) had no glory in this respect**, by reason of the glory that excelleth (the glory of the Melkizedeq Priesthood). 11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious. 12 Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: 13 And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished: 14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in reading the old testament; which vail is done away in [Messiah].
*
“for until this day remains” – sound familiar? – Rah, Rah, Rah All Levitical Law – Really? And there is another point; what was ‘Plan B’ Levitical Law from Torah has turned into the flubdubbery of Rabbinic pick and choose including out-right discarding to injecting fabricated imaginations.
*
Oh; Yes, ‘it was glorious’ Absolutely YHWH allowed and instituted the ‘Plan B’ Levitical Priesthood and Book of the Law. As a concession (mitigation) in place of the complete & utter annihilation of all Israel. Yippiee/Yeah us! Didn’t we kick slop on that one? – What a close call is more like it. Thankyou for the mercies of YHWH.
*
2Cor.3:11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.
*
Now we have a quandary in an enigma wrapped in a conundrum; suffice it to say here that the ‘Plan B’ Levitical Law of ‘death & condemnation’ are ‘done away’; the ‘Plan ‘A’ Melkizedeq Law of Spirit & Righteousness established before (Gen.1:1 thru Ex.24:8-11) “remains”
*
*
And that’s the point; even tho the ‘Plan ‘B’ Levitical Priesthood ‘was glorious’ BUT “[it] had no glory in this respect” it was still the ‘Plan ‘B’ concession for breaking YHWH’s ‘Plan ‘A’; the Melkizedeq Priesthood and Covenants; “the glory that excelleth” ie is more excellent.
*
And this is what most hold to; with their ‘Plan ‘B’ Levitical Priesthood mindset? All the while ignoring or worse, out-right rejecting the Melkizedeq Priesthood and Covenants the obvious originals.
*
Ezk.20:24 Because they had not executed *my (Melkizedeq) judgments, but had despised *my (Melkizedeq) statutes, and had polluted *my (Melkizedeq) sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers’ (pagan) idols.
*
Ezk.20:25 Wherefore I (YHWH) gave them also (Levitical) statutes that were *not good*, and (Levitical) judgments whereby they should *not live*; (Ex.32:10 – Ezk.20:25, Act.15:10, Gal.3:19, 2Cor.3:7-9, Heb.7:12)
*
Who would not want to return to?;
*
Mat 11:30 “For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light” – This is a Melkizedeq statement by the Melkizedeq High Priest – Yahshua.
*

Hebrews thru Melkizedeq Eyes Seris

Torah Without Rabbinics

Part 1 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/melkizedeq-eyes-1/
Part 2 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/hebrews-thru-melkizedeq-eyes-2/
Part 3 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/02/28/hebrews-thru-melkizedeq-eyes-3/
Part 4 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/03/02/hebrews-thru-melkizedeq-eyes-4/

Torah to the Tribes (Hebrews Hebraically)

Introduction* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4GM5-7fYRk&feature=youtu.be
Part 1 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MdPHKe2nso&feature=youtu.be
Part 2* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9A94AqskWO4&feature=youtu.be
Part 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1CetkyXwAY
Part 4* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6s5RMX_WAQ&list=PLXpVLO-UE4XPxkPJk-U7vRjzeeIBg-QLj
Part 5* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NZqsLkAaA&list=PLXpVLO-UE4XPxkPJk-U7vRjzeeIBg-QLj
Part 6* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VFx6sXULT4&feature=youtu.be
Part 7a* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07adGsH-pH0&feature=youtu.be
Part 7b* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCLOZ3MEDqY
Part 8* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpKPECTyEf8
Part 9* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu-3BCixTiI&feature=youtu.be
Part 10a* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x714jCxaIQk&feature=youtu.be
Part 10b* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tupQ431NXU
Part 11* – http://www.youtu.be/dWOXjeh3m6s
Part 12* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69FfkxXJFys&feature=youtu.be
Part 13* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScxZUSBsQlk&feature=youtu.be

* Comments

Please Remember to test all things & all you listen to.

************************
Introduction*
Heb.2:3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by [the Master], and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;

Heb.13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty; with whom, if he come shortly, I will see you.

Act.18:24 And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.

Barnabas or Apollos

Interesting Matthew; Great potential observation.
*************************
Part 2*

The whole Flesh/No Flesh issue – Gen.3:15/Gal.4:4/Heb.2:16 – Acts 17:11
The Yah/Man mixing issue – Gen.2:7, All the ‘Son of Man’ verbiage

TESTAMENT OF LEVI – Great find Matthew – So collaborating

*
CHAPTER 5:2 And He said to me: Levi, I have given thee the blessings of the priesthood **until** I come and sojourn in the midst of Israel.
**until** Just as Gen.49:10 states
*
8:14 And the third shall be called by a new name, because a king shall arise in Judah, and shall establish a *new priesthood*, after the fashion of the Gentiles to all the Gentiles.
1Ptr.2:9
*
18:9 And in his priesthood the Gentiles shall be multiplied in knowledge
upon the earth, And enlightened through the grace of [YHWH] : In his priesthood shall sin come to an end, And the lawless shall cease to do evil. And the just shall rest in him.
 *

Dan.12:4 / Jer.31:34 / Rev.22:11

***************************
Part 4* 1.16.16 – Except for the new use of the ‘usha’ word – Matthew’s presentation of Chp.4 is good – Note Matthew has repeatedly as of yet not responded to my inquiries and proofs to the refuting of ‘usha’ (and other issues) – See- Listen Up! –
https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/10/09/listen-up/

Part 5* 1.23.16 – Except for the new use of the ‘usha’ word forsaking the name Yahshua – Matthew’s presentation of Chp.5 is quite good – Note Matthew still has repeatedly as of yet not responded (Mat.18:16) to my inquiries and proofs to the refuting of ‘usha’ (and other issues – including his errant assertion that ‘shua’ [which unlike usha/sha is an actual stand alone Hebrew word] means ‘vain’ ???) – See- Listen Up! ; from part 4

And consider what I just found –
H4444

מַלְכִּישׁוּעַ

malki^yshu^a‛

mal-kee-shoo’-ah
From H4428 and H7769; king (male) of wealth; Malkishua, an Israelite (male) : – Malchishua.: – Malchishua.
*
Part 6* 1.30.16 – Except for the new use of the ‘usha’ word forsaking the name Yahshua – Matthew’s presentation of Chp.6 is quite good – Note Matthew still has repeatedly as of yet not responded (Mat.18:16) to my inquiries and proofs to the refuting of ‘usha’ (and other issues – including his errant assertion that ‘shua’ [which unlike usha/sha is an actual stand alone Hebrew word] means ‘vain’ ???) – See- Listen Up! ; from part 4
*
Part 7a* – Again – On Heb.7a – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now a couple of months).
Part 7b* – Refer to Part 7a*
*
Part 8* – Again – On Heb.8 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 months).
*
Part 9* – Who’s your Daddy? – Again – On Heb.9 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 1/4 months).
*
Part 10a* – Again – On Heb.10a – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 1/2 months).
*
Part 10b* – See Part 10a*
*
Part 11* – Again – On Heb.11 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 3/4 months).
*
Part 12* – Again – On Heb.12 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 4 months).
*
Part 13* – Again – On Heb.12 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 4 1/2 months).

**
The point is – it isn’t for the lack of complete fully-accounted-for knowledge – it is the ignoring, suppression, denigration of it! – To elevate the lack proof, manufactured, manipulated ‘usha’ word as name over the Name Yahshua– “Matthew even says if you know but don’t speak – You are in sin”

consider

H4444

&

H8668

https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/…/listen-up-2/
https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/…/listen-up-3/

 

 

My Law

My Law
 *
Christians, Messianics and Jews alike all need to wake up to this phrase – What does it mean? What does it define? What does it reveal about Yahweh, His Plan & ‘Rightly Dividing Point? How did Yahshua use, define, deal with, and expand on this phrase?
 *
 *
1st off most all Messianics and Jews wish to re/define all ‘law’ as Torah. But think about it the Hebrew root-word makeup means; The successive light of teaching and instruction. There is no definition of law in that root-word makeup. And there is 19 categories of ‘law’ in the New Testament; all to be known as the 1 in the same Torah (ie Law) with no distinctions?
*
*
Further; this all ‘law’/Torah position is preposterous – for Torah alone is as much accounts of Creation, History, Narratives, Personal Accounts, Pronouncements, Prophesies, Dietary mandates, Covenant Awareness, Breach of Covenant awareness, Com’dts, Teaching, Instruction, that includes ‘change’ (Both imminent and future), etc. as it is the awareness of ‘added’ Law (Gal.3:19) and the reasons for it. (Ex.32:10/Ezk.20:24-25)
*
*
The phrase ‘My Law’ does not mean ‘our law’. YHWH the Sovereign & Creator of all understands the difference between what is ‘our’ and what is ‘my’; go figure? We seriously need to pay attention to what we are reading and what we choose to understand – both from what we see and choose to learn, glean or understand from others, anyone; friends, family, pastors or rabbis, etc. (Acts 17:11)
*
*
The same thing goes for the phrases ‘my feasts’ Lev.23:2/4 and ‘your feast/s’ Amos 5:21. It should go without saying that any time you pollute YHWH’s pure it is now your pollution.
*
Now with this information, look at;
*
Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
*
– What is the obvious? Or should I say; in the spirit of Prv.25:2; What is the not-so obvious? The obvious should include simply by the absence of any other – that this is under the Melkizedeq Priesthood (Gen.14). The not-so obvious is that there is no chance of the Levitical Priesthood involvement at Gen 26:5.
*
The Nation ‘with’ a Levitical Priesthood (Plan ‘B’) came on the heels of the Melkizedeq Priesthood Nation ‘of’ 1st Born Melkizedeq Priests (Plan ‘A’) Covenant breach (Num.3:12).
*
This was when the ‘added law’ (Gal.3:19/Ezk.20:25) was introduced and blended in for the next 15 centuries for the expressed glorious (2Cor.3:11) purpose (that they did Not agree to) of not annihilating all Israel (Ex.32:10). That was the glorious choice for breaking Covenant; ‘death’ or ‘servitude’.
*
Yahshua the Melkizedeq High Priest/Go’el Kinsmen Redeemer’s sacrifice returned all things to the Plan ‘A’ values of Abraham (Gen.26:5) and Abraham’s descendants (Ex.19:5-6/1Ptr.2:9) said;
*
Mat 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of [Yah], and his righteousness;… (ie ‘My’)
*
Mat 11:30 For *my yoke is easy, and *my burden is light. (Jn.7:16)
*
Exampling;
*
Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. (Gen.49:10) – This is the change back to the original Melkizedeq Priesthood
*
So we had Plan ‘A’ because of dis-obedience blending with added law to become Plan ‘B’. But now after Yahshua’s sacrifice we have an unblending of Plan ‘B’ giving way to the return of Plan ‘A’.
*
For the Melkizedeq values even tho blended in to the Levitical Book of the Law – Always did stay in their original pre-Covenant breach Melkizedeq place.
*
That is set at odds against; the Levitical ‘Anchor-Drag’ for Covenant dis-Obedience .
*
Act 15:10 Now therefore why tempt ye [Yah], to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
*
Living your life under Levitical values (turned to Rabbinic values; Talmud, 613, Oral Torah, Takanote, Ma-haSeem, Mishnah, Noahide, Kabbalah, etc.) that include the Levitical Book of the Law not ‘rightly dividing between the two, never did and never will produce righteousness (Gal.2:21/3:21) ie Melkizedeq ‘ My Law’ Covenant Fidelity – Basically the Melkizedeq Law that Abraham & Abraham’s Book of the Covenant (Ex.19:5-24:8) descendants agreed to (Gen.26:5/Ex.19:7-8/24:7-8/Rom.4:16).
*
*
And this is where the Christians err also rejecting all law not discerning between Levitical Law and Melkizedeq Covenant & Law;
*
Heb 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it [the Levitical priesthood] the people received the law,)…
*