Melchizedek Priesthood List

Melchizedek Priesthood List

Melchizedek Priesthood List – (so far – Please feel free to add to)

The following support the Melchizedek Priesthood

TorahWithoutRabbinics – FB


Torah to the Tribes – FB – Salem Oregon

Hebrew Roots Club at Boise State University – Idaho

Remnant of Truth Congregation (of Whitter Calif. & on FB)

Ely Hernandez Ministries – Woonsocket Rhode Island
The Awakening Place –

Yah’s Spirit of Truth .com



144,000 Melchezideck Watchmen Priests of Zion and Jerusalem

Melchizedek Global Network

Passion for Truth – FB & .com Missouri (Show me State )
(Currently Refuting)

Turning Point Fellowship La Mirada Calif.


Withholding verdict upon investigation – Johnson City, TN




Dr. Perry, I have studied the Word (Biible) the majority of my life, as taught by the Christian church. About 14 years ago, I was led to a Messianic Congregation where the entire Word was taught and where the Messiah became truly revealed to me. I give praise to Him for this. In the past year I have been experiencing a “wilderness experience” and have lost in the world’s terms, everything of value; career, home, worldly goods, friends, and loved ones”. I have been praying for an even deeper understanding of the teaching of the Messiah (Torah) and a closer walk with him. Today, you came up on my e-mail and I believe is an answer to prayer. I will studiously study your teachings and pray Yah’s protection over you.
Shalom, Jeaniine


I know a bit of where with you speak.

Many things did not make sense or add up to integrity in my life. As a result I did not believe much or really trust a ‘God’ I really didn’t understand. I did not walk in integrity, finally leaving anything related to Religion, Bible or Church for many years. However; I believe that the One I was taught to call ‘God’ used those years of not going to church to bring me to a place that I was willing … insistent to channel the rage of the past to search, test and know the truth; defining everything, defending nothing that went before. Certainly not believing any man’s word simply by virtue of physical relation, position or title or the number of ABC’s attached to his or her name.

I wrestled back then, as you, as many still ponder and have had this question repeatedly thrown in my face; … How in the world can all of the Christian Church be wrong? Nevertheless that fact remains on many issues! Causing me (back then) and countless others when searching through this convoluted mess to either legitimize it or leave. As you can probably sense; I’ve learned my lesson; when it comes to Yahweh’s Word; I am not going to legitimize anything with out searching it out first and it had better turn up as Truth no matter how many times I choose to test it, regardless of how many times it is challenged by others. Either it’s the Truth or it’s not. Either it’s Scriptural Truth or it’s not. Either it is so or it is not.

From my book – The Covenants of Promise – Blessings

Remain +&-

Remain +&-

2Cor.3:11 ‘… that which is passing away was glorious, much more that which remains is glorious’.

2Cor.3:13 ‘… the children of Israel could not steadfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:..’

You may remember from “The Rightly Dividing Point” dealing with ‘remain’; that we have a problem. “We intelligently know that ‘remain’ cannot be ‘remain’ unless it was established before – Right? But by the same token there is no awareness sense to use ‘remain’ as an informational marker in a sentence unless something did not ‘remain’ – Right? What we now have is a ‘both-and’ situation not an ‘either-or’; we have to use discernment. For that we must let the Bible interpret itself. The Apostle Paul is an indispensable resource, for he deals with these Gospel-Torah matters guided by Yahshua (Gal.1:11-12) studied for three years (v:18).”

The Apostle/exPharisee Paul is demonstrating something very profound; a mid position – The Church is incorrect to say, hold to & teach that ‘it all changed’ for the positive side of ‘remain’ does not allow for this to be true. Some thing/s does/do continue that was established before. Before the Birth, Death and resurrection of Yahshua Messiah.

The Jews (on the other hand) including Hebrew Roots, Messianic, etc. are also incorrect to say, hold to & teach that ‘nothing has changed’ for the negative side of ‘remain’ does not allow for this to be true either. Some thing/s does/do NOT continue that were established before.

This is further evidenced by;

Gen 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, *until* Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

Ezk.20:24 Because they had not executed my judgments, but had despised my statutes, and had polluted my sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers’ idols. 25 Wherefore I gave them *also* statutes that were ~Not~ good, and judgments whereby they should ~Not~ live;

The issues that Do remain include – Yahshua (Gen.3:15; 49:10, Prv.30:4, Isa.61:1, Lk.4:18, etc.), the Melkizedeq Priesthood (1Ptr.2:9 = Ex.19:5-6, etc.), Covenant, the 10 Com’dts, Shabbat, Feastdays (Ex.23/Lev.23), Clean Meats, Redeeming the 1st Born, Passover, New Moons, etc. (Gen.18:19; 26:5, etc.), Heart Circumcision (Lev.26:41, Dt.10:16, Jer.4:4, Rom.2:29); instituted while Israel was Not Physically Circumcising anyone for 40yrs (Jos.5:2; *5) because of the Covenant Break (Ex.32).

The issue that caused the division was the Gold Calf at Ex.32,

The issues that Do Not remain include – Slavery, Animal Sacrifices, Physical Circumcision, the Levitical Priesthood, Levitical issues, Aaronic/Zadok Priesthood primacy (Mt.11:11, Heb.7:7) or any other ‘Judaizing’ issue, etc.

The issues that never were biblically included in either the ‘positive or negative’ side of ‘remain’ include – Sunday, Xmas, Eastre, Valentines, Halloween, May Pole day, Lent, St. Patrick’s Day, All Saints Day, etc. and any other issue not in or commanded in the Bible.


Zec 9:9

John 12:15 Fear <phobeo> not <me>, daughter <thugater> of Sion <Sion>: behold <idou>, thy <sou> King <basileus> cometh <erchomai>, sitting <kathemai> on <epi> an ass’s <onos> colt <polos>.

Zec 9:9

Zec 9:9 ¶ Rejoice <giyl> greatly <m@`od>, O daughter <bath> of Zion <Tsiyown>; shout <ruwa`>, O daughter <bath> of Jerusalem <Y@ruwshalaim>: behold, thy King <melek> cometh <bow’> unto thee: he is just <tsaddiyq>, and having salvation <yasha`>; lowly <`aniy>, and riding <rakab> upon an ass <chamowr>, and upon a colt <`ayir> the foal <ben> of an ass <‘athown>.

As you can see the Greek does not track the Hebrew and is not a complete rendering of the verse sited (Prv.25:2)

Greek – King <basileus> =/= Hebrew – King <melek> ‘is just’ <tsaddiyq> = Melkizedeq


This also tracks

Gen.49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, **until** Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be. 11 Binding his foal unto the vine, and his **ass’s colt** unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes:

Proving Yahshua’s fulfillment of OT prophesy including ‘change’ prepackaged in Torah to include the ‘change’ of the Priesthood back to Melkizedeq and a ‘change’ of the ‘Law’ back to Melkizedeq ‘Law’ (Heb.7:11-12); minus the Levitical law that does Not ‘remain’ (Ezk.20:24-25, Acts 15:10, 2Cor.3:11)

119 “Test Everything” ???

119 Heb's 7:12

119 “Test Everything” ???

Reprint – Answers to Part 2

Drdave Perry .
You keep hammering on “No Change of the Priesthood” in direct conflict of Heb.7:12 which says there was in the ‘past tense’ – As in already happened- 2000yrs ago!…/melkizedeq-at…/


This is supposed to be on Heb.7:12 but goes to Mat.15 – Hmmm? A 119 change – cause they realized their own photo didn’t fit what they were saying? – I do have the original in my photos

(Refutes 119’s Mlk Attack)

This from

This from Donna Teague

“As I read scripture in his Hebrew Roots version, I continue to be amazed. Thought you like to check it out. Maybe you might like to post his website info for the Bibles (all are free except the physical copy which he doesn’t push at all).

(there is a) pdf version of this Bible for your convenience but
here’s where you can get it free in just about any electronic form you wish or order the physical copy:

I have down loaded the pdf – But I must caution you; as good as this may be; I have not completely read this version so my caution to you is across the board – be aware

This version of Gal.3;17,18 & 19 does make the effort to at least insert ‘(Levitical) law’

This is also among other Jewish/Hebrew Roots that rush to translate all occurrences of “law” in the NT to “Torah” trying to add ‘clarity’ no doubt – but – nonetheless add a definition convoluted challenge. The NT ID’s 19 categories of law – so we have 19 different Torahs? This just adds exacerbation to an already confused situation.

These all may contain other issues as well as nuggets of wisdom – Use caution and discernment