The Proper Priesthood Divide

The Proper Priesthood Divide

Over the last few years there have been those that have pulled all communication – pulling all ways to even contact them. I on the other hand have remained accessible. It is as if to say; Do you want to protect what you think you know or do you want to support what you think you know; then and only then making possible learning, understanding & wisdom in correct rightly divided tested truth. Make no mistake; pulling contact definitely protects what you think you know but it is the stuff of calcified 1 sided reasoning – It does not engender or encourage any meaningful thoughtful or interactive midrash ie learning or new revelation.

Some have actually gone on record (audio &/or video) to say something that is absolutely true in much the same way as I would tell it to them over a contested subject – yet they do not see they have snagged their own selves by their own words – This is what the British term as being ‘hoisted by your own petard’. And; as you could imagine – they highly do Not appreciate the calling of attention to it. Again winning no points for the truth.

In the last few recent months; there does seem to be an all of a sudden bum’s rush to deify the line of Zadok as some kind of acceptable Levitical priestline for Messiah – The plain fact is All of the Levitical Priesthood is a Plan ‘B’ concession in-lieu-of Priesthood – It includes Aaron, Zadok, Pinehas, etc. for the breach of Plan ‘A’ Melkizedeq Covenant and its Plan ‘A’ Melkizedeq Priesthood (Ex.19:5-6).

As the Melkizedeq message is becoming more mainstream; it has become fashionable even alluring enough that there is a certain segment of the Messianic (even Church) community certainly among teachers, preachers, rabbis, scholars and lecturers that seek nonetheless to uphold; even champion a Levitical lineage through Zadok for Yahshua haMashiach (Christ). As some sort of needed proper ‘Levitical Mindset’ lineage legality.

And that seems to be more to the point; rather than to justify Yahshua’s Melkizedeq Priesthood – These 1’s in reverse seek to justify the continuance of the Plan ‘B’ Priesthood through a deified Zadok line attached to Yahshua by any means. They nevertheless do so in direct opposition to very clear biblical text to the contrary;

Heb 7:13 For he (Yahshua) of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe (other than Levi), of which no man gave attendance at the altar. 14 For it is evident that [Master Yahshua] sprang out of **Juda**; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest, 16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life…

Yahshua biblically is called ‘the Lion of Judah’ (Rev.5:5); He is never called ‘the ?? of Levi’ (??.??:??)

With Yahshua Himself squaring off to put the final coup-d-gras defining last word on the subject.

Mat 11:11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

This is an iron-clad absolute statement – from the absolute Authority; Yahshua – Son of the Most High YHWH.

How could have Yahshua made such a statement? Unless He knew that John the Baptist was a Levite of the Sons of Aaron – Zadokite line of the Essenes. No natural man born under the Levitical system (Gal.4:4) could aspire to any higher. John being appointed to herald the appearance & coming of Messiah. What could be more pinnacle than that? But; being ‘in’ the Melkizedeq Kingdom-Malkuth of YHWH the King-Melek being greater than John the Baptist by Yahshua’s own words. In as much saying that highest Levitical priest will never be over even the lowest Melkizedeq subject let alone the lowest Melkizedeq Priest (Heb.7:7).

The very reason that people get and stay lost is the same whether in the wilderness or the Bible. No remembered awareness & disregarding direction indicators. These Rah-Rah ‘Levitically/Rabbinically minded’ Aaron/Zadok guys show an unhealthy disregard to do just exactly that. So what are the brass-tack origins to this notion?

Zedek in Hebrew does mean ‘righteousness’ which is a verb. Zadok is the son of a man; that named him Zadok – We 1st see … Zadok the son of Ahitub at 2Sam.8:17. This carries no deification attribute of itself. And as a fact insures that Zadok son of Ahitub is forever a Levite son of Aaron of the Plan ‘B’ Levitical-Aaronic Priesthood. Yet the line of Zadok is deified as some sort of cut-above out ranking ‘righteousness’ priesthood – Mt.11:11

I operate in what I call ‘bottom-line’ theology. I do not care how grand or elaborate anyone has made their line of thinking or reasoning – I do not chase down rabbit or rabbi trails – this saves a lot of wasted time and silly squandered effort & a lot of typing. Rather; What is this anchored to and what are they disregarding to make their wayward conclusions reasonable, feasible and sound oh-so biblical even unquestioningly scholarly?

We all have to deal with the fact that Yahshua came through and died for a bunch of Covenant Breakers that included all tribes; including Levites and even Goy of the nations. These ‘Covenant Breakers’ were remanded to a Plan ‘B’ Levitical-Aaronic Priesthood (Num.3:12) that were all to die for the same ‘Gold Calf’ ‘Covenant Breach’ incidence (Ex.32:10). This broke the Ex.19:5-6 promise severing that ‘perfect’ Plan ‘A’ Melkizedeq Priesthood opportunity for all Israel for the very same Melkizedeq ‘Covenant Breaking’.

For the 1’s that can’t contain themselves saying Rah-Rah the Levitical Priesthood was appointed by Yah – Yes a permissive 2nd place stand-in fix & it was glorious; certainly better than complete & utter annihilation (Ex.32:10). Still it was not Yah’s perfect Plan ‘A’ Melkizedeq Priesthood opportunity (Ezk.20:10-25). This would now have to wait 15 +/- centuries for the coming of Yahshua (Gen.49:10/Gal.3:19); who was born under but kept the law perfectly (Gal.4:4).

He (Yahshua) was declared ‘King’ by others and declared ‘Priest’ after the order of ‘Melkizedeq’ by YHWH Himself (Ps.110:4/Heb.7:21) the transfer of which being brokered & confirmed by John the Baptist. This is what was meant by;

Heb 7:21 For those (Aaron, Zadok, Phinehas, etc. Levi) priests were made without an oath; but this (Yahshua) with an oath by ‘him that said unto him’ (Ps.110:1), [YHWH] sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:…

No imaginary Levi lineage – Aaron married Elizabeth … Zachariah married Elizabeth, Maccabees said, Mary was cousin to, this or that making Yahshua this or that, bla, bla, blahhh. No; Zadok legitimacy elevated coronation; wrenching words into or out of Yah’s instruction (Torah) flubdubbery needed.

Besides All of this Yahshua did Not come through any man as His Father – Therefore is not beholding to or encumbered by any tribal hierarchy or traditions.

When all is said and done it makes sense that Yahshua Messiah would be spared from ever being part of a 2nd string concession Plan ‘B’ Priesthood. It makes absolute sense that Yahshua would be forever & all time be protected from ever being or needing to be a part of or beholding to a Plan ‘B’ Levitical-Aaronic-Zadok Priesthood & its eventualities formed because of the Melkizedeq ‘Covenant Breach’ of Ex.32 – The very Covenant Yahshua kept perfectly to show His eligibility to die as the perfect ransom/sacrifice needed in our place.
Some never miss the chance to lodge ‘eternal & forever’ – That the Levitical Priesthood has been Divinely given an eternal (without end) covenant of intimate high order service … Bla, Bla, Blahhh.

See; –

See –

See – Please use the ‘Search Bar’


Yahshua – The ___ ? of Levi (??.?:??)

Yahshua – The ___ ? of Levi (??.?:??)

Yahushua Melchizedek : The Implications of His Davidic and Zadok Heritage To Understanding His Complete Gospel Of The Kingdom – Audio (In that day intro)

**What is it with the bums rush to prove a position against Bible? This article pushes an idea contrary to basic scripture – while using no scripture as substantiating proof. Contrary to the basic facts layed out by Heb.7:13-15 – Read it your self!

**Zadok is a man – of the Sons of Aaron still just a Levite – This is what Yahshua said Mt.11:11 – Read it your self! Drawing the line of distinction between Levitical (ALL Levitical) and those of the Melkizedeq Kingdom.

**Yahshua does NOT need anything from man – especially fallen man from a fallen Melkizedeq Covenant breach Levitical priesthood (Ex.32:10 / Num.3:12)

By inthatday | August 20, 2014

(This 1 does use scripture in a skewed way to support the conclusion – but still ignores plain bible basics – Reader beware.)

YahushuaMelchizedek_Davidic_Zadok_Kingdom Gospel.mp3

In this discussion we overview the Davidic and Zadok heritage of Yahushua Melchizedek, YHVH’s Great Redeemer, through his mother Miriam, and how this heritage is part of His lawful earthly qualification of the office of High Priest of the Melchizedek order. This human heritage, together with His Divinely begotten heritage from His Heavenly Father lawfully constitutes His Heavenly High Priest Melchizedek order (an order of service that is eternal having no end ). Understanding how His unique human priestly heritage forms an integral part of the qualification of the promised redemptive physical seed of Eve which is able to lawfully stand against the serpent, serves to increase our grasp of the complete confidence that is given to the Redeemed of YHVH, when the true biblical definition of YHVH’s Gospel of the Kingdom is fully understood and accurately proclaimed.

** accurately proclaimed ? – that sidelines or ignores Bible verses to the contrary?

In the course of the discussion we consider what the written Law of Moses and the Prophets declare concerning the Zadok priesthood and how the biblical writ exposes the ancient-modern Talmudic Rabbinical Pharisee mythologies of the Zadok priesthood. Despite archaeological evidence, it becomes clear that these mythologies were historically constructed because of vested religious interests to discredit any biblical authority to the Zadok priesthood being acknowledged throughout Judah’s ancient-modern rabbinical religious memory, in much the same way that Yahushua Melchizedek and the Apostles have been historically discredited. In brief, the Rabbinic mythologies of the identity and history of the Zadok priesthood proclaims that the Zadoks were 1) the Sadducees (which they were not) and 2) that they were Hellenistic imposters of the authentic Aaronic order (which they were not).

In contrast to the Rabbinical mythology, what is actually written in the Law of Moses and the biblical Prophets concerning the Zadoks’ ancient historical past and their prophesied future of priesthood service in the coming messianic millennial era, paints a very different picture.

When the Rabbinical proclamations are examined in the light of what is actually written in scripture and with the Zadok’s own primary resource documents (miraculously preserved for us today in the Qumran library), all Rabbinic conclusions (together with the opposite polemic of orthodox Christian proclamations on who the “Essenes” were), are immediately exposed to have no biblical ground whatsoever, and are but religious attempts by both side of the polemic to distort, mystify, and cover up, with the motivation to both justify and maintain their own religious hegemony of the Kingdom of YHVH through their constructed eschatologies! Even the final releasing of the Qumran scrolls suffered under the greatest academic scandal of the 20th Century – being kept secret from the public for 6 decades ! Indeed Yahushua declared that the Kingdom of YHVH would suffer violence from the agendas of religious men, who through the centuries have worked to impose corrupt replacement systematic theologies to ensure their ownership and control over the Kingdom and biblical truth, with the goal being the continued enslavement of YHVH’s people.

The revealing of the Zadok testimony in these days is thus no less than a Divine miracle and “last days” trumpet blast from Heaven above. The call now is to all men who claim to follow YHVH, to carefully examine the foundations of their theological presumptions and to repent where it may be found that such presumptions have added to or taken away from what is written in the Word of YHVH. It is the Book of Hebrews that exhorts even the last generation to make every effort to enter into YHVH’s millennial “Rest” that is appointed for His Redeemed!

**Oh Brother – Where do I sign?

This discussion presents a brief overview of substantive principles found written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets concerning the Zadok heritage. These being that the Zadok priesthood :-

Are direct descendants of the line of Aaron, qualified by Divine covenant to make acceptable blood offerings before YHVH.

Have been Divinely given an eternal (without end) covenant of intimate high order service to YHVH.
See –

Will be restored to complete their service in the coming millennial reign, where only they will attend directly to YHVH’s “Table” .

Will hold a singular distinctive and authoritative ministry to the Redeemed Nation in the millennial messianic era, to be YHVH’s judges, teachers and ordained declarers of what is profane and what is set apart, what is clean and unclean, and (contrary to religious calendars proclamations of men), they will declare the Divine worship calendar.

Recommended background reading Article: ** Beware!
To assist with the greater context of this discussion, I recommend you download and read the following article: which holds additional information than could be covered in the discussion. (Click on the link below to download the pdf file from the ITD website)

Lord Yeshua, Born The Fulfilment Of The Seed Of High Priest Zadok Of The Aaronic Priesthood, And The Seed Of King David, According To The Flesh!

**Where that Bible verse?

Copyright © 2011 by Richard Aaron Honorof, (published on ITD Website under permission)

The discussion concludes with the exhortation to renew our vision of the true biblical Gospel of the Kingdom of Yahushua Melchizedek, which He has called us to faithfully proclaim to all the cities across the globe where exiled biblical Israel has been scattered to this day. It is vital in theses last days that we make sure we carry an accurate biblical understanding of the Gospel of the Kingdom and what the prophetic scriptures actually reveal concerning the process of how Yahushua Melchizedek’s lawful redemption and birth of the millennial called-out righteous nation will unfold, for in these last days many traditional eschatologies are already being increasingly found wanting and falling very short of truth. Failure to properly know and understand biblical eschatology may cause a great many to become disillusioned and stumble in their faith when the time of the birth pangs begin…

**Buying into this; ‘may cause a great many to become disillusioned and stumble in their faith when the time of the birth pangs begin

Much is to be gained therefore if we have proper understanding of Yahushua Melchizedek’s authentic Gospel of the Kingdom , to be the witnesses to it that we are called to, in obedience of our King’s command. Not only that but we will also be personally blessed by such understanding in 1) to be able to pray that we will be found worthy to stand in the coming dark days, and 2) increased personal confidence with clarity of vision , and 3) our spiritual gift of discernment will be strengthened to keep us from the deceptions and shortcomings of the range of confused “kingdom theologies” and eschatologies that exist across the divide of the historical Rabbinic-Roman Christian religious polemic.

**our King’s command? Mt.6:33 & 11:11 – That 1?

A true biblical understanding of YHVH’s Gospel of the Kingdom renews our joy and strengthens our spiritual ability to hear how we are being called to prepare to be part of the “wise virgins” that Yahushua Melchizedek prophesied would arise in the last days. He prophesied these “wise virgins” would be enlightened by having enough “oil in their lamps” to guide them in their necessary final preparations that will enable them to be ready for His gathering Angels, immediately before the coming of our Great Redeemer-King, Yahushua Melchizedek, who will cover them under the “shadow of His Wings” in that day of great darkness and judgement that is fast approaching the kingdoms of men.

Glory and Praise to Yahushua Melchizedek, The Great Redeemer of YHVH, who comes in the Name of YHVH to “restore all things”!

**And that’s the point “restore all things” back to the Melkizedeq original not part way to a Covenant Levitical Breach.

**Yahshua is called The Lion of Judah (Rev.5:5) for a reason – He is never called The ___ ? of Levi (??.?:??).

**Yahshua does not need some supposed Levitical ‘legitimacy’ to be or have anything. (Ps.110:4/Heb.7:21)

** In fact it makes sense that Yahshua would be protected from ever being part of a Leviticle breach, Plan ‘B’ priesthood (Num.3:12/Heb.7:11).

The ___? of Levi?

The ___? of Levi? vs The Lion of Judah

I find this work – exerting spurious biblical assertions to be suspect – in that it offers no Bible to support such / any of its claims.

Answer this Yahshua is called by Bible;

The Lion of Judah – from the Tribe of Judah

Tell me biblically where is Yahshua ever called by Bible;

The ___? of Levi ??? – from the Tribe of Levi?

this is bottom line theology – I do not care how grand the construct – what is this anchored to.

What is more; some try to ‘prove’ Yahshua is of the Tribe of Levi

Using such ‘proofs’ as;

Luke 3:23 And [Yahshua] himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
Luke 3:24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of *Levi*, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,

Looks good until you consider Yahshua’s patriarchal lineage did not come thru any man (Luke 1:35), That’s why the ‘supposed’ part of v:23 – Besides the name ‘Levi’ is an Israelite name not necessarily exclusive to the Tribe of Levi. No Yahshua Levi lineage proof here!

Then some will site that since John the Baptist is Yahshua’s cousin that voilà Yahshua is now somehow Levite. Just because Zachariah was Levite and married Elizabeth (a relation down-line cousin to Mary or Mary’s mother or father), does Not automatically make Elizabeth or her relation (in this case Mary’s mother or father) or Mary herself a Levite. – And consider Elizabeth was a cousin (1st, 3rd, twice removed, etc. ???), that means that Mary’s mother or father had a sister or brother (a Jew) or cousin (Jew or other Tribe) that married Elizabeth’s mother or father (or grandparent or?) No Yahshua Levi lineage proof here either!

Besides all this – Those that munch after or pine for some shred of proof to substantiate a valid Levi/Levite/Levitical position; have to do so dis-regarding direct Biblical proof to the opposite. But then again this is the stuff of the Messianic ‘Levitical Mindset’.

Heb 7:7 And without all contradiction the less is blessed of the better.

Heb 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of [Melkizedeq], and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
Heb 7:13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar.
Heb 7:14 For it is evident that our [Master] sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.
Heb 7:15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of [Melkizedeq] there ariseth another priest,

“without all contradiction, blessed of the better, not be called after the order of Aaron, the priesthood being changed, pertaineth to another tribe, For it is evident, our [Master] sprang out of Juda, it is yet far more evident …”

These are emphatic absolute terms and phrases. The honest cannot summarily just disregard this! To do so anyway is to find yourself at odds pitting the Bible against itself.

But then some will happily do so anyway – 2Ths.2:10-12

Acts 17:11 – Yahs Esteem


Melkizedeq Attack 8

Melkizedeq Attack 8

Hello, Dave. As promised here is the response i said I would give you. it has been posted in the group, but as they have a tendency to remove things i thought i would send it to you directly.

In a recent discussion regarding a topic posted on this forum, Drdave Perry made some startling comments regarding the (alleged) termination of the Levitical priesthood. He expressed his views, which he has every right to do so, but in a very belittling and disrespectful manner to dissenting members of the group, me included. Regrettably, the thread has since been deleted, so I can’t cite the claims made verbatim. However, I promised to challenge what he said. In light of that promise, I will now proceed to do just that.

In his statements, Drdave ** claimed, and I apologise if I miss anything here given the absence of the thread material to which I am referring:
Joy Morgan ++
Drdave **

++1.) That I was an agent of misinformation. (That claim can be judged by others after reading my response. Personal opinions on my person are of little to no relevance, but defending the word is!)

** Yes Yah’s Word is

++2.) That Melchizedek was not a priest after the manner of the Levitical high priest and that he was not a king in accordance with YHWH’s promises to Yehudah; this is because, according to Drdave, the tribes of Levi and Yehudah were not yet extant at the time of Melchizedek.

**extant – currently or actually existing – Levi and Yehudah were not yet extant at the time of Melchizedek of Gen.14 – They did not exist – That is plain to see.

++3.) That Yeshua did not have Levitical lineage as well as Yehudite.

** This twists the obvious; Yahshua did have a Yehudite (Jewish) lineage Heb.7:13-15

++4.) That there is no connection between the marriage of Aaron and Elisabeth and the marriage of Zechariah and Elisabeth the mother of John the immerser.

** This tedium is trying – You admitted Zechariah’s Elisabeth was Jewish – ergo Mary was Jewish

++5.) That the Levitical priesthood has disappeared.

** Yahshua say so Himself – Lk.13:35

++So let’s take a look at his claims.

Ok, Shem is Melchizedek. Let’s get that out there from the get-go. If you do not know why Shem is Melchizedek, a synopsis can be read here:

** A qualified – Agreed

++Shem/Melchizedek was the official priest of YHWH and king of Salem, an early name for Jerusalem. He was the progenitor of Jacob. Jacob fathered, among others, the tribes of Levi and Judah.

**@Shem, … He was the progenitor of Jacob. Jacob fathered, among others, the tribes of Levi and Judah. – among 10 others – now you defacto admit Shem came before therefore not of or from Levi and Judah his down line.

++Shem/Melchizedek was, therefore, both a Levite and a Yehudite as both tribes were in his loins, so to speak. There are numerous occasions in Scripture when a person’s future offspring are promised, blessed and defined in advance of their conception, even generations beforehand, so we have plenty of precedents here. I’m more than happy to supply specifics for this (and for anything else I have stated, or will state) to anyone interested. For now, it is sufficient to say that Shem was already the high priest of what would become the Levitical priesthood, and that he was already the king ruling from Jerusalem on the throne of David- just as Yeshua will be both priest and king ruling from Jerusalem on His return as YHWH promised to David.

** Your logic is inverted & catiwampus – lineage moves in 1 direction from the original to the progeny not the other way around
@Shem was already the high priest of what would become the Levitical priesthood – This is just too lame. The Levitical priesthood came because of Mlk Cov’t breach – Shem had no part of that.
@ Yeshua will be both priest and king ruling from Jerusalem on His return as YHWH promised to David. – This is more of your random association – David was never promised a priesthood.
Besides this was gutted by 1Kgs.9:5-9 confirmed by Lk.13:35

++Now David was a descendant of the tribe of Judah via Pharez, not Zarah. Pharez was the brother of Zarah, the sons of Judah, but the transition of the Davidic dynasty was to progress through the Pharez alone. Isn’t it amazing that Yeshua was born through the descent of the house of Pharez. I hope this will become a more profound truth as I progress with this discourse. I ask that readers bear in mind: “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, Nor a lawgiver from between his feet, Until Shiloh comes; And to Him shall be the obedience of the people.” Genesis 49:10

** Do you understand that Genesis 49:10 is the premier change of/in Torah? Back to the Melkizedeq Priesthood! Confirmed by Gal.3:19 & Heb.7:12.

++Genesis 49:10 is an amazing promise. Its fulfillment commenced with the deliberate and symbolic marriage of Aaron the representative high priest of Levi to Elisabeth the representative of the future monarchy of Judah. I’ll do my best, at least, the best I can without typing an entire book, to give some insight on how this union was destined not only to last forever, but also to produce a ruler after the order of Shem/Melchizedek who, like Shem, would qualify to be both the high priest of the Levitical priesthood and the rightful heir to the Pharez line of the house of David. All being well, the strings will tie together as I go on.

** There you go with some whack assessment of Elisabeth the Jew – Elisabeth is not the point Mary is – Biblically can you produce anything to support such a claim – in the face of Heb.7:13-15 / Rev.5:5?

++Shifting our focus to Drdave’s claim that the marriage of Aaron and Elisabeth is irrelevant to the marriage of Zachariah and Elisabeth, and vice-versa, let’s see where this claim leads us.

Aaron and Elisabeth’s marriage created a merging of the tribes of Levi and the tribes of Judah (if you are unfamiliar with either genealogy, or both, please don’t hesitate to ask me). This union gave birth to the first-born sons of the tribe of Levi/Judah which would go on to implement the function of a priesthood designed to take away the sins of the people via its sacrificial system. Does any of this sound familiar?

**This is preposterous – back then the lineage was determined by the Father (By Torah still today) – And how ’bout all the other cross over combinations of 12 (actually 13 + converts) tribes a potential for 156 + cross over combos multiplied by 1000’s of times and that over centuries. Yet you want to make this strictly about Aaron and Elisabeth drawing your tale down to Zachariah and Elisabeth. Just because Elisabeth was Mary’s cousin does not mean Elisabeth & Mary had the same mother and Father. Mary was a Jewess this does not change just because an aunt or cousin marries outside her tribe.

++The first-born sons make blood sacrifice to make atonement for the people and take away the sins of the guilty by the blood of the innocent? It should do. On numerous occasions from the word, we see Israel’s redemption and its redeemers emerging from the union of Levi and Judah as I will show (I will also show this truth from the Levitical family of the Maccabees). Likewise, John the immerser was the product of the union between a Levite (Zachariah) and a Yehudite (Elisabeth). John immersed Yeshua and in doing so, once again demonstrated that salvation comes through the Levi-Judah nexus;

** John immersing Yahshua shows the transference of Priesthood from Lev. to Mlk. – not some co-mingling “nexus” sameness – Proof? Mt.11:11 if you can understand.

++John was the one who proclaimed the Moshiach, immersed the Moshiach and inaugurated and prepared the atoning sacrifice through the Levitical priesthood in the process. Beautiful! Thematic! Never changing! All these are types and nothing is coincidental. Incidentally, Yeshua waited until the age of 30 to be immersed and begin His ministry. 30 is the minimum age requirement for admission into the function of priest in the Levitical system. His immersion was a Mikvah as also required for officiating priests.

**Yes – Hence the transference from Lev. to Mlk. – John even admitting he was not worthy.

++So we see the offering, the priest and the king was all heralded and inaugurated through the Levitical system. I will now show that Yeshua is this atoning, priestly king according to His dual Levite and Yehudite lineage.

**There is no ‘His dual Levite and Yehudite lineage’ Heb.7:13-15 – Yahshua is the ‘Lion of’ Who?

++Yeshua is the first and only ruler who possess the claim to rightly and simultaneously be high priest of the Levitical priesthood; He belongs to the only Levitical line with the authority to offer blood sacrifices and enter into the Holy of Holies, and He will sit on the throne of David ruling from Jerusalem in the 1,000-years reign to come. He alone fulfills the requirements; He alone is like Shem/Melchizedek in this.

**If He is like Shem – (which I can agree) – Then like Shem, Yahshua has no tie to a Plan ‘B’ for Cov’t breach Levitical priesthood.

++As I alluded to, Yeshua is of the house of Zadok from His Levitical side. The house of Zadok is the only descendant house of Aaron which is permitted to perform sacrifice. YHWH never rejected the Levitical priesthood and simply exterminated the differing lines within it save the line of Zadok. This line descends directly from Aaron, through El’eazar, through Phineas (to whom YHWH again promised an everlasting priesthood, adding further protection to the Levitical priesthood. Phineas is a direct progenitor of Zadok), and down to John the Immerser and Yeshua.

**Again – like Shem, Yahshua has no tie to a Plan ‘B’ for Cov’t breach Levitical priesthood. This includes Phinehas, Zadok, Aaron and his Sons all Levites – Yahshua & John the Immerser were at best 2nd cousins in no way insuring a Levite lineage to Yahshua.

++All this was engineered by YHWH from the beginning of creation to retain the Levitical priesthood function forever while destroying the lines of Aaron’s other sons which rebelled, and while barring the admission of those who could not prove their appropriate lineage (Nehemiah 7:53-64). YHWH does not break covenant, ever! (Psalm 89:34; Exodus 28:1; 29:9; 40:15; Numbers 18:7-19; 25:13; Deuteronomy 18:5). The Levitical priesthood has always been, and will always be, indispensable to His plans. Salvation was and is built around it.

** There you go again making outlandish statements that the facts do not square with.
@The Levitical priesthood has always been, and will always be, – This statement is a direct lie – there was none such till after the Ex.32 Mlk. Cov’t. Breach. Num.3:12
@All this was engineered by YHWH from the beginning of creation to retain the Levitical priesthood – Not a chance – the Levitical priesthood was the Plan ‘B’ concession rather than complete annihilation Ex.32:10. How glorious is that?
@YHWH does not break covenant, ever! Right -OR- His pre-packaged pre-awareness (Ex.19:5-6)
It is not some illegal change to enact the pre-awareness condition of change.
@The Levitical priesthood has always been, and will always be, indispensable to His plans. Salvation was and is built around it. – Wrong! Ezk.20:10-25, Acts 15:10 / Heb.7:11
His plan of Salvation was always built around Gen.26:5 – Melkizedeq Law! Rom.4:16

++In the future, Yeshua will build the 3rd temple. This temple will have Yeshua as the high priest of the Levitical priesthood with the house of Zadok in attendance. Ezekiel 44 proclaims this truth while clarifying precisely why certain lines of the priesthood were destroyed. So contrary to Drdave’s statements, the priesthood was not disestablished. He also made the claim that the priesthood were lost and that the destruction of the temple was evidence that the promises YHWH made regarding the everlasting covenant had somehow been dissolved.

** @In the future, Yeshua will build the 3rd temple. – Is that so? To quote you – Perhaps [you] never heard of the Temple Institute. Or understand wherewith you mis-speak – the Temple Institute is man’s efforts Not Yahshua’s.
You mis-state the situation again – Yes Yahshua as the high Mlk. priest will certainly be over all that is the Levitical priesthood if there will be such. And what eludes you is that no past from death to life Mlk. Prst will ever be under even the Highest Lev. Priest (Mt.11:11)
Also if you are not a Levite you have no part of the Levitical priesthood you insist to banner. 1Ptr.2:9 is your only priesthood choice.
But the point is & always will be Everlasting! Without end! Remember? Where are they? Any of them? Davidic King – Lev. Prsthd – Any of them? For the last 2000yrs – To crow about it & demand it to be so when it is not – when it has been not – For the last 2000yrs and before is just flat out plain insanity.
To ignore Yahshua’s Lk.13:35 pronounced lament and what that means is just beyond dishonest & undiscerning.

++Clearly, Ezekiel demonstrates that a temporary suspension of function due to the destruction of the temple does not constitute a disbanding of the priesthood, and is careful to point out that as part of the reign of Moshiach, that scenario will be remedied by the construction of a third. Drdave also made the bizarre assertion that “Levi had disappeared” and that “no one knows who they are.”

**@Drdave also made the bizarre assertion that “Levi had disappeared” and that “no one knows who they are.” This is what is ‘bizarre’ – Quotes indicate I physically said or wrote this – check your records & get your facts straight. I did not!

++A quick internet search would have sufficed to prevent him making such silly claims. The Levitical priests have always continued to function in Judaism, have always been known, and are now being trained up in preparation to perform sacrifices in a third temple. Perhaps he’d never heard of the Temple Institute. It’s plain silly to make such claims. But anyway, as said previously, Ezekiel makes it clear the 3rd temple will allow once again for the Levitical priests of the house of Zadok to perform blood sacrifices;

**What is ‘plain silly’ is your demand that – The Levitical priests … now being trained – What they do forget? When did that happen? Hmmm 2000yrs ago?
@The Levitical priests have always continued to function in Judaism – How without a Temple? – In Jerusalem? – Talk about ‘bizarre’&’silly’ – Israel has only been a Nation for 67yrs Hmmm what’s the span of 67 from 2000? Puts a big hole in your unbroken story – That you must square with!
Ezekiel makes it clear the 3rd temple will allow once again… ??? once again… ??? Indicates a lapse in your everlasting without end model – How can that be?

++Yeshua will be high priest and head of state. This is what it means to be a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek, not some supplanting new system dreamed up by the author of Hebrews- either Paul or one of his Hellenistic disciples.

**Ahh – now you know more that Paul – Who quoted Ps.110 (Heb.7:21) – Now you know more than David too? I guess you don’t like Peter either (2Ptr.3:15-16) – “Our beloved brother Paul” Which Apostle do you like? You have set yourself at the arbitor of Bible. Where does this imagination stop?

++I’d like to finish by looking at the bloodline of Yeshua’s mother, Miriam. We’ll see how the Levitical line of the Maccabees ties together with the Davidic line of Judah to produce Miriam. Thus giving Yeshua dual Levite and Yehudite heritage.

**Don’t forget pagan heritage thru Rahab & Ruth – What’d He get then?

Luk_1:27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, **of the house of David**; and the virgin’s name was Mary.

++The historic genealogy of Miriam can be traced back to Janna Maccabee. Janna wed Eliub and this marriage produced a child named El’eazar. El’eazar fathered three children. One of his sons was Mathan. Mathan married Alexandra the daughter of Hyracanus II. Hyracanus was the brother of Salome Maccabee. Salome was the woman to whom El’eazar was married and with whom he had his three children.

One of the daughters of El’eazar and Salome was Rachel. She gave birth to Joseph of Arimathea. Her husband was Mathat. Mathat was of the house of Nathan who was Davidic/Yehudite. Mathat’s wife then went on to birth Joachim and Zacharia. Joachim in turn fathered Miriam the mother of Yeshua.

Boom! Throughout human history, YHWH has had the Levitical tribe and its everlasting priesthood right at the heart of redemption for His fallen people.

Drdaveperry, you simply do not understand the topic about which you have been so quick to be pompous and condescending.

**Joy your problem is your absolute statements are less than accurate let alone absolute. Then you revere Apocrypha and any other provocative source which is not Bible; for a reason & that over Bible and castigate those in the Bible based on your personal drothers.
Boom! Throughout human history … ??? Adam&Eve, Noah to Abraham, Issac, little boy Jacob ??? That human history? – This’ll be a shock but there was No Levi, No Levi Tribe & let alone a Plan ‘B’ Levitical priesthood that came some 400yrs later. That human history?
The biblical Yahshua is called ‘the Lion of … ? Judah’ for a reason Gen_49:9 , Hos_5:14, Rev_5:5
Now – I guess you don’t like Moses, Hosea or John now either

++So let’s close with a resume of the facts: a.)

** Yes; let’s close with and resume of the reassertion conundrum of the less-than facts

++1.) Melchizedek is Shem. Melchizedek appears as Melchizedek in only two places in the Tanakh, and in only four verses in total (Genesis 14:18, 19 and 20; Psalm 110:4). That’s it outside of Paul’s and/or his disciples’ writings.

**Honestly? This is outside of any disciples’ writings. Or did you miss that? Or maybe intentionally intend to misrepresent that point to ahh ooh mislead?

++Next to nothing is divulged about this king and priest in the verses in which he appears. There is no mention of anything regarding a future priesthood which will supplant a temporary one,

** So now you admit the Levitical priesthood was temporary
You misrepresent again – The Melkizedeq Priesthood was the original – That’s why Heb.7:12 is accurate – a ‘change’/reversion back to the original
@”There is no mention of anything regarding a future priesthood which will supplant a temporary one”
– Read Prv.25:2

++and evidently there is nothing contained in the verses to preclude the establishment of what would be- from the perspective of Genesis 14:18-20- a future priestly function. This future priestly function, it is stated, will be everlasting (Exodus 40:15 & Deuteronomy 18:5).

** @evidently there is nothing contained in the verses to preclude the establishment of what would be- from the perspective of Genesis 14:18-20- a future priestly function. – Yes the Melkizedeq Priesthood – but, then you do not discern & mix your metaphors saying Exodus 40:15 & Deuteronomy 18:5 which is Levitical. After the Mlk Cov’t breach of Ex.32
everlasting from ‘olam’ – does not always or only mean our concept of Forever, Eternal, Everlasting, Evermore or ‘for all time’. ‘A concealed – vanishing point – out of mind’ means; for a really long extended period of time and does not only mean any of the forgoing but does not exclude any of them either – discerned context is the key.

++So how did Paul and/or his disciples manage to fabricate an entire theological system on four verses which tell us nothing more than: Melchizedek was the high priest of YHWH, that he was king of Jerusalem (though the city was know by a different name at the time), that he blessed Abraham and YHWH, and that he received a tenth of the spoils plundered by Abraham.

** …Paul and/or his disciples … – You forgot 1Ptr.2:9 & Rev.5:10, etc.

++Further to this, we read in the Psalms that the Moshiach will be a priest of YHWH forever according to the order of Melchizedek. However, the word used for ‘order’ is the Hebrew word ‘Dibrah’, and without any other information to go, simply means ‘after the manner of’. Well what exactly was the manner of Melchizedek? We cannot say without speculating and leaning on our own understanding, which is utterly forbidden. What we can safely go on is this- Melchizedek’s priesthood in no way excluded the establishment of the Levitical priestly function, nor will any system ever replace it so long as there is time. ‘Forever’ hasn’t been and gone, nor will it until our current time/space reality passes away and that won’t be until after the thousand-year reign of Mashiach.

**everlasting from ‘olam’ – does not always or only mean our concept of Forever, Eternal, Everlasting, Evermore or ‘for all time’. ‘A concealed – vanishing point – out of mind’ means; for a really long extended period of time and does not only mean any of the forgoing but does not exclude any of them either – discerned context is the key.

++b.) The writings of Paul and/or his disciples cannot be used to justify their own writings. If it isn’t in the Torah and the prophets, it’s nowhere in YHWH’s authorised Word (Amos 3:7). The claim that Kepha regarded Paul’s Epistles to be ‘Scripture’ is a bogus one for a number of reasons: 1.) Kepha was familiar with the methodology employed by the Hebrews when deciding whether or not something was the Word of YHWH. A writings or book required at the very least to be theologically consistent, historically accurate- time, location, persons, etc., and must be prophetic.

** What is ‘bogus’ is your twist truth error laden ramblings – That disregard the Bible & biblical record

++c.) The idea of the Levitical priesthood having to become redundant in order for Yeshua to fulfill His role as high priest is unequivocally wrong and unnecessary:

**’ redundant’ do you know the definition – a useless repeat? This does not make sense!
Mt.11:11, Heb.7:7 – Oh but now you don’t like Matthew now either or the Yahshua he quoted.

++1.) As already stated, the high priest function of Melchizedek did not preclude the high priest function of Aaron, nor the function of the Levitical priesthood.

** this is your whacky assertion – Mt.11:11, Heb.7:7 & others proves otherwise

++2.) Yeshua has levitical blood through His mother. Miriam was of the tribe of Yehudah, which qualified Yeshua for David’s throne; and she also had Levitical blood in her genealogy. This qualified Yeshua for the role of high priest within the Levitical system. He is a perfect high priest of YHWH and king of Jerusalem just as Melchizedek. This is what the Psalmist means by the Moshiach being a high priest forever after the manner of Melchizedek. Yeshua has married the perfection of Melchizedek’s priestly and kingly capacities to the Levitical priestly function, and for the first time within the Levitcal priestly function we now have a high priest who doesn’t need to offer sacrifices for His own sins, unlike all who went before Him.

** Yeshua has levitical blood through His mother Miriam – even if in some minuscule way – don’t forget the other tribes of pagan heritage thru Rahab & Ruth was does that say?
Heb.7:13-15 along with Rev_5:5 is the definitive narrative

++3. The Levitical priesthood was married to the Yehudite Messianic bloodline in the marriage of Aaron the high priest to Elisabeth, so given this truth with that of Miriam’s direct Levitical bloodline, we see yet again that there is absolutely no need for any change of priestly function. Nothing in the entire Word of YHWH supports a change of priestly function. Nothing at all.

** Nothing at all ??? Heb.7:12 – More – less than absolute statements that make you look ridiculous

d.) We should all look forward to the millennial reign of Yeshua. His kingdom will be preceded over by Himself as both king and high priest, just like the reign of Melchizedek; the Levitical priesthood will have their third temple spoken of by Ezekiel.

**This too is not what it seems; Read

Answer this Yahshua is called by Bible; The Lion of Judah – from the Tribe of Judah
Tell me biblically where is Yahshua ever called by Bible; The ___? of Levi ???
This is bottom line theology – I do not care how grand the construct – what is this anchored to?

++ Thanks for taking the time to read.


If it does turn out that Shem and Melchizedek are the same person, this scripture should prove no stumbling block, because it could be interpreted to mean that priesthood authority commenced with Adam and came through the fathers, even till Noah, and then to Shem. –

** [meaning] that priesthood authority [Melkizedeq only] commenced with Adam and came through the fathers, even till Noah, and then to Shem. – Good – Finally; then to Abraham, Issac, the unmarried Jacob – No Levi involved or Lev. Priesthood till after 400+yrs – Till after the Mlk. Cov’t Break Ex.32. (Num.3:12)
Acts 17:11 – Yahs Esteem

Melkizedeq Attack 7

Melkizedeq Attack 7

The redacted position accessing the rebuttable presumption of the space-time continuum a conundrum of the cosmos light speed vortex … Bla, Bla, Blahhhh

1st off – It is a debaters tactic – If you control the words, terms & phrases especially the 1’s you’ve made up you control a manipulatable conversation of your own creation.

2nd this is all the Levitical Priesthood that came (after) as result of the Melkizedeq Covenant breach of Ex.32 – No matter how many Pinehas spins and Zadok twists you can Levitically argue in favor of Aaron (still All levites)

3rd “High Priesthood” this is a Rico Fantasy ‘extra biblical’ phrase therefore NOT a biblical term.

4th this ‘Torah/Hebrew’ Levitical mind-set/Rabbi enamored teacher still uses the baby/infantile non-Hebrew, non-Torah, non-Covenant terms; God, LORD/Lord & Jesus, not discerning to raise the bar of knowledge and obedience (Heb.6:10-14). Mouthing honor to yet bowing to Rabbinic rule to not use Yahweh’s Name. Playing into & confirming his audience’s ‘I Doh Wanna’ attitude; because of his own ‘I Doh Wanna’ attitude.


Rico’s original post ‘if’ you care to or can access it – For he evidently has taken to lobe stones from a safe secured position.

The Following By Rico Cortes ++
DrDave’s Answers **

1++Shalom L’kulam

Many are now saying that the Levitical Priest are no longer part of the plan of God and that the Melchizedek Priesthood is now in Order. The Problem is that Elohim can not break his own oath given to the Levites. I would like for you to read about the Covenant with Pinchas which is in this week’s torah portion.

** 1st off YHWH will not break an Oath, Promise or Covenant – OR!!! – The pre-awareness proviso (Amos 3:7) that was stated before the forgoing was breached by the other party (Israel ie us & grafted in).


** This a card-stacking technique that has little to do with Yah & the Bible up to – CHALLENGING (or Forgetting) THE PRE-AWARENESS WARNING IS AN AFFRONT TO THE AUTHORITY AND KINGSHIP, WISDOM & FOREKNOWLEDGE OF YHWH & the MASTER Yahshua.

a pact of priesthood for all time The biblical notion of an eternal covenant, berit ʿolam,63 is also attested in extra biblical sources, for example, Akkadian adi dāriti, ūmē ṣâti, “an everlasting covenant, for all time.”

** Rico knows (or should) that ‘olam’ does not always or only mean our concept of Forever, Eternal, Everlasting, Evermore or ‘for all time’. ‘A concealed – vanishing point – out of mind’ means; for a really long extended period of time and does not only mean any of the forgoing but does not exclude any of them either – discerned context is the key.

4++ The text here mentions “the priesthood,” not the High Priesthood, which gives rise to the rabbinic suggestion that Phinehas did not become a priest together with Aaron and his sons (Lev. 8) but only when he killed Zimri.64 It may be the High Priesthood that is intended here.65 Phinehas is awarded the High Priesthood just as the Levites have been awarded the priesthood (Exod. 32:29; see Mal. 2:4–8)—for suppressing apostasy. However, the likelihood is that Phinehas is here promised that his line, later called the Zadokites (see Ezek. 44:15–16), will be the exclusive officiants in the Temple (see Excursus 61 for details).

** But the Bible wouldn’t mention ‘the High Priesthood’ this is Rico’s wish-list spin for there is no such designation in the Bible.
“It may be”- Appealing to ‘rabbinic suggestion’ is like the hen asking the fox for advise about the chicks.
The thing Rico (& others) will not to see is that no matter how you slice it or mix it; Phinehas, Zadok along with Aaron and his sons are all (every one Livites) of the Plan ‘B’ damage control for covenant breach priesthood, for ALL Israel was to be annihilated including Aaron & Sons (Ex.32:10/Num.3:12)
“It may be”; “the likelihood is” turns to an absolute statement “will be the exclusive” – ???
“Excursus” – Early 19th century: from Latin (???) –…/excursus -&- 8 – Is Israeli Hebrew Unique in Being a Western Language (semantics, use of tenses etc.) Under a Semitic Skin …
More of Rico’s adopted unbiblical terms – again posturing to gain superior control of this presentation & direct the conversation from an imaginary perceived uncontested scholaresq position.

5++ This covenant is one of five issued by God: the promise to Noah that humanity will not be destroyed, the promise of seed and soil to Abraham, the Torah to Moses (and Israel), and dynasties to Phinehas and David (cf. Jer. 33:19–22; Ps. 89:29–38).*** It constitutes another royal gift bestowed upon the High Priest, who, like the king, wears special robes and a crown and is anointed (Lev. 8:12; 2 Kings 11:12). Now, by virtue of this covenant, he is granted a ruling dynasty.***

** This covenant is one of five issued by YHWH: Rico is right about 5 but completely misses the ‘Covenants of Promise’ class of covenants (Eph.2:12). Which are all Melkizedeq. Phinehas and David are not.
This completely ignores, overlooks & misses the warning proviso of 1Kgs.9:5-9 confirmed by Yahshua at Lk.13:35. For those who would miss this ‘your house is left to you desolate’ is the slam-dunk end all that would include the Kingship & the Levitical Priesthood (Hosea 4:6) from Torah that had already been from Babylon corrupted.
For the point about the priests see;
There it is again “ruling dynasty” a ricoism – biblically where?

6++This dynastic promise to Phinehas, however, encounters the historic difficulty that certain High Priests, the Elids, trace their descent to Phinehas’s uncle, Ithamar (1 Chron. 24:3, 6).66 This passage, then, may reflect the victory of Zadok (the descendant of Phinehas) over Abiathar (the descendant of Ithamar). The two served jointly as High Priests during the reign of David, but Solomon banished Abiathar from his office, as told in 1 Kings 2:26–27 (see 1 Sam. 2:27–36), leaving the High Priesthood exclusively to the line of Phinehas.

** There it is again “dynastic promise” another ricoism – biblically where?
“This passage, then, ‘may’ reflect” – again a supposition leading to an absolute; oblivious of the proviso & confirmation of. See Answer 5b

7++ (story above and fight with the two priesthood during the reign of david and how Zadok was faithful to david who was appointed by Elohim to be King is why the sons of Zadok will officiate in the third temple.) my commentary here

** See;

8++ However, the text mentions “priesthood” not “High Priesthood.” The exact phrase, moreover, is “everlasting (ʿolam) priesthood,” which occurs in two other places (Exod. 29:9; 40:15), where Aaron’s dynasty is granted the priesthood. Hence, the reference here is not to the office of High Priest but to all those who are authorized to function as priests in the sanctuary. Therefore, it is more likely that the Baal-peor incident served to justify the banishment of Abiathar’s entire family from the Jerusalem Temple, leaving the Zadokites alone as the officiating priests.

** There it is again “High Priesthood”& “Aaron’s dynasty” other ricoisms – biblically where?
“everlasting (ʿolam) priesthood” – See Answer 3
Rico does not even precieve that Ex.29:9 is under the Melkizedeq Priesthood; while Ex.40:15 is under the Levitical priesthood for Covenant breach (Ex.32:10)
“the Jerusalem Temple” ??? – That did not happen till decades possibly centuries after Ex.40:15 – still under the Levitical priesthood tho.

9++ Other priestly families continued to serve on the staff of the First Temple but not as officiants (Ezek. 40:45–46; 43:19; see Excursus 61 for details) making expiation Rather, “ransoming” (see 8:19 and Excursus 19). By means of his passion (kinʾah), Phinehas provided a ransom for Israel, and God’s wrath was assuaged. So too, when the Levitical guard cuts down the encroacher on God’s sancta, he also provides a ransom that stays God’s wrath from venting itself upon Israel (see the Comments to 8:19; 18:22–23).67 Phinehas, as chief of the Levitical guards, now fulfills this Levitical function.

**There it is again “Excursus” – See Answer 4f
‘his passion’ ? Another ricoism from Mel Gibson? Biblically where? – ‘assuaged’ – ‘sancta’ ??? Biblically where? – Like I said control the terms; control the conversation/presentation.
“Phinehas, as chief of the Levitical guards, ‘now’ fulfills this Levitical function” – Now? Right Now? Where are they? Any of them? Phinehas? the Levitical guards? A functioning Levitical anything?

10++ Later tradition, interpreting “plague” as slaughter,68 claims that Phinehas’s example was followed by his loyal supporters,69 and it was they who slew the twenty-four thousand Israelites (v.9).

** All this still under the Levitical priesthood; and completely ignores the return to the Melkizedeq Priesthood of which Yahshua is the High Priest of – Ps.110:4, Heb.7:11-12; 21, 1Ptr.2:9, Rev.1:6; 5:10

++ Milgrom, J. (1990). Numbers (pp. 216–217). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.

** So let’s put this all in perspective – Rico you (and others) want to elevate defending the Levitical priesthood while you denigrate the Melkizedeq Priesthood of Yahshua no less – Basically saying Rah, Rah, Rah Sis Coom Bah the unbroken royal Kingship on the throne lineage of David & Rah, Rah, Rah Sis Coom Bah the unbroken Priesthood of Aaron, the unbroken Priesthood of Zadok, the unbroken Priesthood of Phinehas – Sounds Great! Accept for 1 problem. Unbroken; remember? Where are they? Any of them? For 2000yrs? Where are they on the Throne, in a Temple, even in a tent functioning in any capacity? And if you say ‘in the millennium’ – besides the ‘unbroken’ part; this is to all 12 tribes; and just who will set that up? YHWH? Or a bunch of Torah usurping / Covenant breaching / Out of Order / Priest replacing Rabbis? That have gutted the Levitical priesthood to a distant faint memory?

Saying it’s so when it is not is the hallmark defining definition of insanity. Just like saying it is not there when it is. It is/both are a schizophrenic religious construct.

Just like Yahshua said at Lk.13:35 – your ‘house’ not a Kingdom is left to you desolate meaning no King AND no Priesthood. That was right at 2000yrs ago.

And this comment in support of Rico by Diana Dye – The original covenant was the Creation or eternal covenant. All the other covenants are aspects of this covenant and have clearly not been “done away with.” The restoration of the creation covenant signifies the return of Melchizedek as High Priest – i.e. Adam in the garden. This in no way replaces the purpose and function for the Levitical priesthood.

** These 1’s as teachers need to understand the terms they just throw out as being accurate when there are not – The best the original covenant of Creation is not an eternal covenant but an everlasting covenant – Simply; 1 has a beginning; 1 does not.
About ‘olam’ – See Answer 3
About “done away with”; See –
“This in no way” this ignores the plain evidence of Ezk.20:10-25 and the New Testament – See Above^^^
Clearly the Plan ‘A’ Melkizedeq Priesthood is far&away superior to the Plan ‘B’ Levitical Priesthood forever because of Covenant breach – Yahshua Himself makes that point abundantly clear (Mat.11:11/Heb.7:7)

See –