Books & Literature

Those that will not read have no advantage over those that cannot read – Mark Twain

“The ultimate ignorance is the blind opinion charged rejection of any issue; coupled with the arrogant absence of correct knowledge which refuses to investigate what is known little or nothing about” – Dr. David L. Perry Th.D.

Brief Synopsis outline of;

‘The Covenants of Promise’
– Deals with the ‘The Covenants of Promise’ of Eph.2:12. Identifying the Biblical Covenants that attach directly to Abraham’s Promise Covenant of Gen.15. Distinguishing these various Melchizedek Covenants as distinct from Levitical Law (Gal.3:10; 19 / Heb.7:11-12). And the caveats involved with these various Melchizedek Covenants – Which always involve 5 issues – 1] a Proposal, 2] an Acceptance, 3] a Blood Ratification and 4] a ‘Covenant Confirming Meal’ – Which always involves 5] a direct attachment to Gen.12 thru Gen.15

‘Back to the Melchizedek Future’
– Deals with the return to the original Melchizedek Priesthood (1Ptr.2:9). Ex.19:5-6 is the original open invitation call to that Melchizedek Priesthood. When the Israelites broke the Ex.19 Covenant with the ‘Gold Calf’ (Ex.32) – They had defiled themselves; no longer eligible to be Melchizedek Priests (This included Aaron and Aaron’s Sons). They were thrust under the Levitical Priesthood (Num.3:12 / Heb.7:11-12) for the next 15 centuries until Yahshua – the High Priest after the Order of Melchizedek (Heb.7:17; 26). Reconnecting the New Covenant Melchizedek Priesthood (1Pt.2:9) with the Melchizedek Priesthood of the Original Covenant.

Book – ‘The Covenants of Promise’ – PDF Download – minimum $15 Donation

Book – ‘Back to the Melchizedek Future’ – PDF Download – minimum $15 Donation

Dissertation – ‘The Book of the Covenant distinct from The Book of the Law’ –
PDF Download – minimum $15 Donation

The entire 613 law list (18 pages) – Along with my findings –
PDF Download – minimum of $5.00 dollar donation

Or to Donate to ‘Yah’s Spirit of Truth’ and/or ‘Torah Without Rabbinics’

Thank You for your ministry donations

Send to Dr.Dave – via PayPal –

Please use through Paypal using this email address.

or mail check to – Dr. David L. Perry POBx 1111 Bloomington Calif. 92316
(Along with your eMail eddress)

Blessings & Yah’s Esteem


2 Parts

Shiloh Logo

2 Parts

Gen.49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering <yiqqahah> of the people be.

‘Until’ is a 2 part prophesy; ‘until Shiloh come’ is the 1st part – “the gathering <yiqqahah> of the people be” is the 2nd part.

The “gathering <yiqqahah> of the people” is the progressive unfolding 2nd part, starting when Yahshua was here the 1st time during His earthly ministry. Culminating with His return – the 2nd time.

03349.  hhqy  <yiqqahah>,  yik-kaw-haw’
from the same as 3348; obedience:  -gathering, to obey.

You can almost see it –  *’gathering’ for the purpose ‘to obey’* – If you will.

So now that portion of the verse reads;

“ … and unto him shall the obedience <yiqqahah> of the people be.”

Obedience is not a ‘right-now’ proposition – it is a gradual process, as this verse attests to;

Php.1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Yahshua Messiah:

That ministry started when Yahshua was here the 1st time aprox. 2000yrs. ago. Look at all the believers now (&/or those that claim to) of His New Testament/Covenant ministry – Sunday Christians, Sabbath Christians, etc. – Feast keeping Hebrew Roots, Messianics, etc. – It’s definitely been a process.

And we can’t intelligently burn the bridge we ourselves crossed over on.

Yah’s Esteem




Gen.49:10 ‘The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; …’

(Shiloh – epithet [another name] for Messiah i.e. Title of Yahshua)

Note; There are those that will assert and insist that ‘Shiloh’ Hebraically means ‘to whom it belongs’ – I have researched this and can find no such definitive thing. Be that as it may; who would argue that the Messiah is that one ‘to whom it belongs’?

Ams.3:7 Surely Yahweh will do nothing, but he reveals his secret unto his servants the prophets.

This is more than a pronouncement (which is fundamental in itself) this is prophesy – ‘until’ being an awareness of impending change. That some would very much like to explain away. They would have a much easier time if it weren’t for the fact that the Apostle Paul (and others) gives evidence of this ‘change’ in the New Testament. The question to ask is; ‘where’d they get this stuff – Rabbi School?’ If that were so, the world should be filled with this knowledge but it’s not.

Gal 3:19 ‘Wherefore then serveth the law? (the Book of the Law v:10) It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; … ‘

Heb 9:10 ‘Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.’ – ‘Messianic restoration’.

Act 3:21 ‘ … until the times of restitution of all things …’ (Peter v:12)

Act 6:14 For we have heard him (Stephan v:8) say, that this (Yahshua) of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and *shall change* the customs which Moses delivered us.

Act 15:10 Now therefore why tempt ye (Yah), to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?

Heb 7:12 ‘For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.’

(Please read Heb.7:1-17 for your full edification enjoyment)

Then there are also those (Hebrew Roots / Messianic, etc. – For the Jews deny that He came the 1st time) that will assert that; “until Shiloh come” (Gen.49:10) means the 2nd time when Yahshua Messiah returns as conquering King to set up His Kingdom. This would effectively delay any Melchizedek claim or change; while preserving the Aaronic/Levitical Priesthood mindset and its laws.

Gal 3:19 ‘Wherefore then serveth the law? (the Book of the Law v:10) It was added because of transgressions, *till the seed should come* to whom the promise was made; …’ (Gal.3:16)

Rom 1:3 Concerning his Son Yahshua Messiah our master, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

Gal 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Messiah (ie Shiloh).

[The One to whom it belongs – If you will; to coin a phrase]

“until Shiloh” returns? – ’till the seed should’ return? Rom.1:3, Gal.3:16; 19, etc. effectively renders this ‘2nd time’ position / assertion as unfounded and untenable; for ‘seed’ speaks of a start – an initial beginning. It speaks of the 1st time – It speaks of His birth. It speaks of His 1st advent/coming.

Remember Torah also states ‘that in the witness of two or three the matter is established’ (Dt.19:15/2Cor.13:1). This then is the awareness we must realize –

It is not a change of Torah to enact the change in Torah

;that has in fact always been right there in the pages of Torah i.e. the first five books of Moses.

‘What a revolt’n development’ – Yosemite Sam.

The truth of the matter becomes; to refuse the change that has always been there in Torah as prophesy is to ‘diminish ought’ from Torah (Dt.4:2; 12:32).

Yah’s Esteem

The Melchizedek Guide


The Melchizedek Guide

This Article meant as a brief ‘Guide’ is far from exhaustive; meant only to point the way.
For a more complete understanding get the Book – ‘Back to the Melchizedek Future’

Gen.1:1 to Ex.24:8-11 is the original Melchizedek Priesthood (Heb.7:3) if by only reason of default of there not being any other. The Melchizedek Priesthood is the primary ‘Plan A’ of Yahweh. ‘The Book of the Covenant’ (Ex.19:5-24:8) is the covenant that promised the Melchizedek Priesthood to all Israel ‘if’ they would keep the covenant (Ex.19:5-6). They did not. YHWH’s solution was to wipe them all out and start over with Moses (Ex.32:10) – the last Melchizedek Priest; for the others (all Israel) had defiled themselves (including Aaron and his sons), having broken the covenant they had just ratified 40 days earlier (Ex.24:7-8).

Moses pleaded for the people – YHWH relented; but now instead of being a ‘nation of priests’ (Melchizedek Priests) from the first-born of all tribes; ‘Plan A’; after the ‘gold calf’ they would now be a nation ‘with’ priests – Levitical Priests from the tribe of Levi (Ex.40:13-15, Num.3:12; 8:14-16); ‘Plan B’ – the Levitical Priesthood was born.

This means that ‘The Book of the Law’ (Dt.31:26) had its start from Ex.24:12 – being the ‘added’ Law (Gal.3:19) outside the blood ratified Covenant (Ex.24:7-8/Gal.3:15) – running through to the end of Deut.. The Levitical Book of the Law must be approached with discernment for there are issues initialized under this Levitical Book of the Law and there are issues that are merely restated (Melchizedek restatements) – Such as The Sabbath, The Ten Commandments, The Feast Days, New Moon, The Redeeming of the First Born, Clean Meats, etc. – that stand in their original Melchizedek position (pre-Ex.24:8-11).

Issues initialized [first mentioned] (under this Levitical Book of the Law (Ex.24:12 – Dt.31:26) include Tzitzits (tassels – Num.15:38), Tithing, Tefillin (Phylacteries – shel rosh head & shel yad arm), Day of Atonement (Lev.23:28 – not found in or before ‘The Book of the Covenant’ – quite possibly from Ex.32:30 post covenant breech), etc.

Rom 5:11 ‘.. but we also joy in Yah through Yahshua, by whom we have now received the atonement.’

Gen.17:9 ‘in their generations’; in connection with circumcision – Num.15:38 ‘throughout their generations’; in connection with ‘Tzitzits’ – Num.35:29 ‘throughout your generations’ in connection with Levitical statutes in contrast with;

Jer 31:32 ‘Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers … which my covenant they brake’

“Fathers” speaks of ‘generations’ – “my covenant they (the fathers) brake” is Paul’s exact argument;

Rom 2:25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

For those fixated, convinced of physical circumcision against the clear teaching of Paul – Know that after the ‘gold calf’ covenant break the Israelites stopped circumcising their young for the next 40yrs. (Jos.5:2; 5), well past the time of the tzitzit injunction of Num.15:38. Modern times – Know that means that you are being obedient to Jos.5:2 (under the Levitical Priesthood) and NOT to Gen.17 (under the Melchizedek Priesthood) connected with the Covenants of Gen.15 (Abraham’s Promise) and Ex.19:5-24:8 (Abraham’s Answer) which these same Egyptian Israelite ‘fathers’ broke.

Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. (Gen.49:10)

Gen 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come;

This ‘change’ – metathesis – is a reversion back to the original Melchizedek standard of ‘Plan A’

That’s why we will sing the ‘song of Moses’ & the ‘song of the Lamb’ (Rev.15:3) – They are both Melchizedek mediators of their respective Melchizedek Covenants. 1] Book of the Covenant, 2] The New Covenant.

Oral Torah is a myth; Talmud, Mishnah, Avot, etc. is commentary of scripture – it is NOT Torah.

Dt.31:24 And it came to pass, when Moses had made an ‘end’ of writing the words of this law in a
book, until they were ‘finished’,

‘End & Finished’ doesn’t leave much wiggle room – now does it?

Yah’s Esteem – Dr. David L. Perry

Need Proof?


Need Proof?

We’ve all been taught that Yahweh (Jehovah –God) ‘changes not’ contains ‘no shadow of turning’ is no ‘respecter of persons’, the ‘same yesterday, today and forever’, does not alter ‘what has gone from [His] lips’, etc.

If we read the Bible; we have read;

John 7:16 Yahshua (Jesus) answered them, and said, “My doctrine is not mine, but His that sent me.”

Mat.19:17 And He [Yahshua] said “… if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.”

Now; while looking at Leviticus 23 truthfully ask yourself;

1] Do I believe Yahweh (Jehovah–God)?

2] Why does Yahweh (Jehovah–Father God) call these ‘My Feasts’ and not Jewish Feasts like we’ve been taught?

3] Does my Church or religious source keep them or explain them away? … Or any part thereof?

4] Should I keep them or learn how to explain or pray them away?

5] If Yahshua kept them and Paul kept them; did ‘everything change at the Cross’?

6] Why does the Apostle Paul convey in so many ways that there are Abraham and Mt. Sinai Covenant issues that ‘remain’?

7] Why does Heb.4:2 point us back to the Covenant at Mt. Sinai while calling it ‘Gospel’?

8] Why did the Apostle Paul keep and teach Feasts to (and with) gentile believers if Yahweh’s Appointed Times truly had been “done away with at the Cross”?

9] Why does the Church ‘gloss over’ Eph.2:12 and :19 that reveals believing gentiles are full citizens in the “commonwealth of Israel” and the fully functioning Covenants thereof?

10] If your Church or Bible group is so Bible based … If your ‘Pastor’ or ‘Teacher’ is so truthfully tell’n it like it is; why have you never heard (let alone acted on) any of this before?

Realize … it does not matter one bit … how convincing … how eloquent … how artful … how academic … how reasoned … how sophisticated or how smooth the delivery; to ignore Lev.23 is to ignore Yahweh Himself, His Covenant-Commandment Keeping Son Yahshua and to be in serious Covenant breach … Period!

Need more proof? Read the last three quarters of Deut.28; and pick out the ancient Torah curses for not keeping Yahweh’s Covenant that read like today’s news.

If this has sparked your interest, you obviously are ‘open-minded’ perhaps questioning, maybe to the point of being cynical and skeptical. You definitely are not ‘simple minded’ (Prov.1:22, 14:15). If, on the other hand you are incensed or infuriated, you no doubt have much of the traditional wisdom to defend. There are a host of fallacies on all sides masquerading as Truth … supplanting the Truth that has been thrown out or at the very least ‘side lined’. This Truth ‘shell game’ is directly and indirectly related to the improper (or more accurately the lack of) divisioning of what is Covenant and what is Law, that very much do have a direct bearing on both Salvation and Reward. Whether interested or infuriated, grab your “fruit of the Spirit” (Gal. 5:22-23) … and hang on.

Before Yahweh; I encourage and challenge you. Don’t think you are going to be spoon-fed Truth by anyone. Your Pastor or Rabbi will almost certainly only substantiate what you’ve always heard. This book is not some status-quo touchy feely ‘I’m OK- Your OK’ skim-able material. This book deals with Biblical evidences and a paradigm perspective that are not currently being considered or taught. Actually crack open your Bible like the ‘Bereans’ (Acts 17:10 -11) and “see if these things are so”. Take the time to thumb through your (or get a) concordance, dust off your dictionary, go to the library look up some of these issues in the encyclopedia and/or get a library-card, borrow what you need or can find and cross-reference. Actually; “prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of Yahweh” (Rom.12:2).

Ezekiel 33:6 “But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity (or lawlessness); … but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand.”

Please know I take this very seriously and I intend to sound that ‘alarm’ for all it’s worth!

Isaiah 58:1 “Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and shew … ‘my people’ … their transgressions and the … ‘house of Jacob’ … their sins.”

The Intention of these Books is to do just exactly that.

Yah’s Esteem

How could Paul say;


How could Paul say;

Acts 24:14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way (Messianic Believers in Yahshua) which they call heresy, so worship I the Elohim of my fathers, believing **all** things which are written in the law and in the prophets:

Even tho Paul was ending his Nazarite Vow (Num 6:18; Acts 21:23-24) in the only Torah prescribed way – Some try to use and misconstrue such passages to say; Ah-ha see Paul supported and kept Levitical law – that includes such things as Tzitzits, Curcumcizion, a Livite only Levitical Priesthood, Sacrifices, etc.

Despite the fact that the Apostle Shaul/Paul himself evidencing;

Heb 7:12 For the (Levitical) priesthood being changed (back to Melkizedeq v:11-24), there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

Rom 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of Yah.

1Cor 7:19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of Yah.

Gal 5:6 For in Yahshua ha Messiach neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

Gal 5:11 And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased (?) [This is actually a rhetorical question]

Gal 6:15 For in Yahshua ha Messiach neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Yahshua ha Messiach:

Here’s a bomb shell I just found.

These are the word’s of Yahshua; John 7:22 “Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the Sabbath day circumcise a man.”

Note – ‘not because it is of Moses (ie Torah ie Gen – Deut.)’ in other words Not because of Gen.17 but of Jos.5:2; 5 (see ‘The Jos.5:5 Connection’ on Torah Without Rabbinics on Face Book)

John 7:22 “believing **all** things”is Paul’s ambiguous, crafty, subtle, veiled defence to a largely Jewish crowd believing **all** things that they (the Jews) would take to mean inclusive of all Levitical law – BUT – he (Paul) does not state – BUT – rightly includes Gen.49:10 – change of the Priesthood / change of the law;

Gen 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; …

Therefore it is NOT a change ‘of’ Torah to enact the change ‘in’ Torah; that has always been in Torah.

Gal 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law (defined by v:10 – in connection with v:17-18)? It was added (to the Covenant v:17-18 ) because of transgressions, **till the seed should come to whom the promise was made;…

Heb 7:11 ¶ If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

This is the true message of Paul as learned from Yahshua (Gal.1:11-12)

Yah’s Esteem