Listen Up! 3

Listen Up! 3
*
Usha – The Level of DisHonest*
Silence (as is hostility) protecting against the ‘Truth’ or any direct or indirect tailoring of the fully accounted for facts are the tools to defend and protect a lie!
*
Its not so much the use of the ‘usha’ word as it is the level of protection that includes silence to outright hostility – 1 is passive the other aggressive both are dishonest!
*
1st proponents of ‘usha’ (inclusive of ‘yahu’ & ‘sha’ or ‘yah’ & ‘usha’) will NOT comply to the request to show all or completely;
*
The Biblical verse – with
The stand alone Biblical word – with
The Biblical definition – with
The Biblical reference number
*
Along with this; they refuse to entertain let alone validate that the components of the Name Yah-Shua (inclusive of ‘yeshua/h’ = salvation) are correct and valid therefore the Name Yahshua is valid even tho they once did. They can’t stand and will not supply let alone validate or agree to an honest look at the details of the ‘Truth’.
*
2nd – Using ‘tactics’ instead
*
a- ‘Cardstacking’ showing examples and proofs that may be contained in words but are NOT actual words that stand alone by themselves.
*
b- ‘Redirection’ changing to or introducing a new topic to ‘redirect’ from the original topic and/or changing the question to avoid the answer of the previous question or giving an ‘answer’ that does not track what was asked, mainly to avoid being painted into a corner (like a ‘chess’ player thinking 3 moves ahead) and having to give an honest answer they do not want to give. (Note – Silence effectively does the same thing)
*
c- ‘Grandstanding’ making unfounded claims that are bizarre and/or absolute
*
d- ‘Name calling’ / ‘Affixing labels’ (self defining)
*
e- ‘Character assassination’ (self defining)
*
f- Making so-called ‘irrefutable statements’ – Example forth coming;
*or
g – (and my favorite) – a ‘Litany Dump’ overload (ie ‘unloading everything’ at once) even better in a video that has no searchable word doc. A completely unmanageable non-distinct ‘bird’s nest’ of all (including barely & nonrelated) issues that seeks to protect the line of thot or views AND clearly is not interested in finding or weighing the ‘Truth’. (Act.17:11) Quite effective if uncontested ‘Pontification’ of errors as truth is your goal.
*
What I have found is proponents of ‘usha’ will be silent even deleting their own stuff -or- They will be hostile, rude and arrogant – BUT neither (& every point therein) will be honest.
*
(From an actual exchange)
*
“YOU CANNOT DEBATE OR REFUTE anything I have spoken.”
*
What an arrogant absolute statement – The problem with absolute statements is that they are rarely absolute. Do you possess the honesty to look at the facts let alone produce them?
*
You speak of those things that ‘need protection’ – apparently your position needs the most vile and dishonest kind of ‘protection’ possible.
*
Let’s look at the facts – I’ll show you mine
*
Yah
Yeshua
Shua
*
All are Hebrew words with definitions
*
What in the lake of fire does
*
Yahu
Usha
Sha
*
Mean? Where is this stand alone word? What is the reference num#?
******************
So Attention! – Nothing else will do – Show!
*
The Biblical verse – with
The stand alone Biblical word – with
The Biblical definition – with
The Biblical reference number
*
Again – The point is not so much the pronunciation of your preferred word as it is your willingness to denigrate trashing the Name Yahshua to elevate your hodge-podge of make believe wish it were so non-words – coupled by your lack of honesty to actually squarely show any of your stand alone words as being in fact stand alone.
*
As well as your lack of honesty to favor (only allow) a negative definition for ‘Shua’; when Halloo – call or cry, is a neutral – (cry of pain / of joy) – while ‘riches’ is a definite positive
*
Let alone wilfully mistaking it for Shav – ‘vain’
*
And – While you’re being honest – You need to squarely account for these actual Hebrew words;
*
Hallelu-Yah – Note :- Not Yahu
*
* yeshua/h – Gen.49:18 – Salvation
*
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
*
H4444
מַלְכִּישׁוּעַ
malki^yshu^a‛
mal-kee-shoo’-ah
From H4428 and H7769; king (male) of wealth; Malkishua, an Israelite (male) : – Malchishua
*
H8668
תְּשֻׁעָה תְּשׁוּעָה
teshû‛âh teshû‛âh
tesh-oo-aw’, tesh-oo-aw’
From H7768 in the sense of H3467; rescue (literally or figuratively, personal, national or spiritual): – deliverance, help, safety, salvation, victory.
*
And this just in 3.9.16 – I have been made aware 4 days ago of an exhaustive book by Ernest David Klein called ‘A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language’. It is frustratingly tedious to use as there is no legion or index or reference number system or even page numbers to access this non-reference number system; especially when you find certain words are just not there, that include Shua, Malkishua, Teshuah & ???, that of course he – Klein (no longer with us) simply doesn’t tell you about. Why?
*
However I was able to find ‘yeshua/h’ on pg 265, 3rd Column, 2/3’d down – just as Gen.49:18 renders it – ‘Salvation’ also defining it as ‘help, victory, welfare & prosperity’ which puts a huge snag in their get’along and does not vie well for the ‘shua’ only means, has to, just gotta mean ‘vain’ camp (that include some ‘big name’ presenters ???  – and sadly a growing list of others) and renders this work ‘ACEDHL’ by Klein suspect as to why the other valid ‘shua’ words (and possibly related words) are just not there. Of course the phantom faux – make-a-wish stand alone ‘usha’ / ‘sha’ words are not there as well.
*
I will make this challenge to every and all ‘usha’ or equivalent ‘wish it were so namers” – I will supply the online link to this “…  Etymological Dictionary …”; you supply the effort. Find;
usha, yahu, sha, yahusha – BUT – be fair; also find yah, halleluyah, yahshua, shua, yeshua/h (oops already did) or any you can think of. But try hard and be fair.
*
I have put in all the effort in this frustrating direction I care to.
*
https://ia801004.us.archive.org/0/items/AComprehensiveEtymologicalDictionaryOfTheHebrewLanguageErnestKlein1987OCR/a comprehensive etymological dictionary of the hebrew language ernest klein 1987 OCR.pdf
*
For your refresher;
*
Listen Up! 2
*
I am posting this again for the honest will want the ‘New’ information – Those protecting a pet view will not – They will continue to ignore, write over, talk over, paste over, side-step valid facts – This is flatly Not Honest! This is called ‘Belief Perseverance’ it is mental but it is Not Honest! Saying – ‘Don’t trip me up with the details of the Truth’.
*
PicsArt_12-29-06.29.18.jpg
*
This image was Willy Wonka and it said – Yahusha? – You learned Hebrew on Facebook; didn’t you?
*
To all the johnny-come-lately variants that do not reflect and / or actually teach against Yahweh and Yahshua and the use thereof – Listen Up!
*
Well at least you have the pagan – God/god, LORD/lord, Latin prefix/Greek suffix Jesus thing right
*
Some 10 / 15yrs ago everyone was fine with Yahweh and Yahshua without much variant. Now however it has become in-vogue, even fashionable to pander to, assert, even force this as a point of contention.
*
All in the name of being special with secret special untapped knowledge – Ooo
*
Yes – There are variants of the tetragrammaton – YHWH (Yahweh), YHVH (Yahveh) and YHUH (Yahueh) – The point is we just don’t know thanks to the Pharisees and Rabbis but what we do know is Yah is the prefix short form from Ps.68:4 – And whether; eh, Ah or ah even Yahooeh, Ah or ah the suffix transition to any of these variants will produce a ‘W’ sound (except from ‘V’). However the suffix eh, Ah or ah is still consistent.
*
Actually Yahshua is the construction of & means the call to or the rich (shua) * Shua – Job 36:19, salvation (yeshua) * yeshua/h – Gen.49:18, of Yah * Yah – Ps.68:4 (short form of Yahweh) – As in Abram’s name change to Abr’ah’am, As in Sari’s name change to Sar’ah’, As in the verb ‘yeshua’ being changed to the Name Y’ah’shua – as in the universal Hebrew phrase no matter what language; Hallelu-Yah – Praise Yahweh.
*
Salvation from Yeshua/h – & – Yahh from Ps.68:4 – & – Hallelu-Yah – & – shua meaning the rich call to Salvation and that is the $64 question – What does ‘usha’ mean? – Not a ding dong thing in Hebrew.
*
Proponents of ‘usha’ point to some guy that made a video or wrote an article or a series of them that plays fast and loose with the facts – that assert a construct of wish it were so Hebrew word confabulations – that completely ignore the nuts & bolts of the matter.
*
Now show me your preferred stand alone word;
*
yahu/yahw/yaho or usha/wsha/osha or sha or ??? for that matter in any verse – with the definition and reference number (Note – don’t even try citing 3467/8 for ‘sha’ )
*
Side note ‘usha’ is the sanskit **girls** name for a demon goddess
*
Now – how honoring is that?
*
See – Torah Without Rabbinics wordpress . Com – Search ‘usha’
*
(Note among the initial complaints is that ‘yeshua/h’ is a feminine verb)
*
You make up a spelling YaHU יהו. not found in the text as if it was a legitimate stand-alone Hebrew word. Complete with No definition & No reference number & No verse –
*
Some will lodge – Yahshua spelled יהשוע isn’t found in any text
Yet ignore legitimate Hebrew words such as;
*
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Total KJV occurrences: 78
*
H3050
יָהּ
yâhh
yaw
Contracted for H3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name: – Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Cp. names in -iah, -jah.
Total KJV occurrences: 49
*
Bla, Bla, Bla, Blahhhh – Some take the long way around to try and prove what I have already exposed – they stand beside a bunch of nothing – “Tell me the exact reference number with the Hebrew stand alone word usha or sha – No one ever has”
*
To showcase and elevate the ‘usha’ fantasy wish it were so word, proponents try to denigrate the actual word ‘shua’. Some will go so far as to lodge ‘vain’ from Exodus 20:7 as ‘shua’; But are in fact caught in a lie, tailoring a cherry-picked wish-it-so evidence
*
H7723 Vain
shâv’ shav
shawv, shav
(This is at best dyslexic, at worst dishonest – saying that shawv / shav is somehow shua – even if we grant u in place of v; the word would be shawu or shau)
*
H7723 from H7722 – This must be the presumed ‘chink’ in the amour – Yet it does not change the fact of H7723 Vain and H7769 Halloo – cry (a neutral), riches
*
H7722
שֹׁאָה שׁוֹאָה שׁוֹא
shô’ shô’âh shô’âh
sho, sho-aw’, sho-aw’
*
H7769
שׁוּעַ
shûa‛
shoo’-ah
From H7768; a halloo: – cry (a neutral), riches.
*
By definition hal·loo – “used to attract someone’s attention” – It is a neutral – Some try to say ‘cry’ is a negative – But it too is a neutral – Example ‘cry for joy’ ??? ‘shout of praise’, etc. ??? And ‘riches’ who would not want that? So this ‘cry’ is to the rich ‘salvation’ (yeshua/h) of YHWH thru Yahshua.
*
Yahweh is not the Elohim of confusion
*
And they said what??? “Which isn’t found in any text”??? – Don’t look now but they are hoisted on their own petard. I guess deceitful rhetoric is as far as their honesty goes
*
Proponents invariably always comment their assertions without proof – For that’s the only way they can validate their crock-a-load.
*
Now 1] show the stand-alone Hebrew word of your choice 2] with the verse it is used in, 3] with the definition of and 4] the reference number for this imagined word.
Yahu
Usha
Ushua
Sha
Yahw
Wsha
Yaho
Osha
Or any as long as your arm imagined variant of the forgoing.
*
*Some actually defiantly say “I don’t have to show proof” – Why? because they’re in a corner and they have nothing. What’s worse they know it but do not want to admit it while they duck and dodge to save face. Not showing proof in good faith (Act.17:11); is not credible or honest. These 1’s are suspect and not to be believed especially at face value on their ‘say-so’ alone showing undocumented in-lieu-of so-called proof.
*
I’ll show you mine
* Yah – Ps.68:4
H3050
יָהּ
yâhh
yaw
Contracted for H3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name: – Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Cp. names in -iah, -jah.
Total KJV occurrences: 49
*
* Shua – Job 36:19
H7769
שׁוּעַ
shûa‛
shoo’-ah
From H7768; a halloo: – cry (a neutral), riches.
Total KJV occurrences: 2
H7770
שׁוּעַ
shûa‛
shoo’-ah
The same as H7769; shua, a Canaanite: – Shua, Shuah.
Total KJV occurrences: 3
*
03444. hewvy y@shuw`ah, yesh-oo’-aw
feminine passive participle of 3467; something saved, i.e. (abstractly) deliverance; hence, aid, victory, prosperity:–deliverance, health, help(-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
See Hebrew 03467 (yasha`)
… shuw`ah
07769. ewv shuwa`, shoo’-ah
from 7768; a halloo:–cry, riches.
*
* yeshua/h – Gen.49:18
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Total KJV occurrences: 78
*
And consider what I just found –
H4444
מַלְכִּישׁוּעַ
malki^yshu^a‛
mal-kee-shoo’-ah
From H4428 and H7769; king (male) of wealth; Malkishua, an Israelite (male) : – Malchishua.: – Malchishua.
*
And this from Teddy Wilson of ‘Seekers of Yahweh Ministries’
*
H8668
תְּשֻׁעָה תְּשׁוּעָה
teshû‛âh teshû‛âh
tesh-oo-aw’, tesh-oo-aw’
From H7768 in the sense of H3467; rescue (literally or figuratively, personal, national or spiritual): – deliverance, help, safety, salvation, victory.
*
And you might want to look up and factor in the word ‘Teshuva’ – to repent, turn around. (But then again opponents might not)
*
So —- – shua, yeshua, Yah means something – What from the Bible does usha/ushua/wshua/wsha/sha mean? Zipp0 – Nada – n0thing
*
Consider – Usha is a Sanskrit name **for girls** meaning Morning, Dawn, Sun rise
http://www.baby-names-meanings.net/meaning/usha.html
*
And lookie what else I found
03388. avwry Y@ruwsha’, yer-oo-shaw’
or Yaruwshah {yer-oo-shaw’} >>**feminine**<< passive participle of 3423; possessed; Jerusha or Jerushah, as >>**Israelitess**<<:–Jerusha, Jerushah.
So the **feminine** argument concerning shua/ushua/wshua/oshua – is just out to lunch. This after all is among the ‘usha’/ ‘sha’ proponents initial **feminine** ‘girl’ complaints about the Name based on ‘shua’ / ‘yeshua/h’. — So Go Fish! —
*
And look here at this – The worship of this *”goddess”* spread throughout all the cultures of the world. She is found in India as the Hindu dawn- *goddess* “Usha/Ushas,” and in Western cultures and religions of today, including Christianity, called **”Easter”**. – What an Honor ???
http://assemblyoftrueisrael.com/Documents/Sunworship.htm
*
And this
answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110219075731AAovnI6
USHA – *Female* Hindi myth name of a demon *princess*.
More Honor to your Highness ???
*
(Note among the initial complaints is that ‘yeshua/h’ is a feminine verb)
*
So Attention! – Nothing else will do – Show!
*
The Biblical verse – with
The stand alone Biblical word – with
The Biblical definition – with
The Biblical reference number
*
or admit the demon *princess* research and that you are in error.
*
Of all the barrel chested demanders – No 1 ever has
*
They have no choice but to admit the demon goddess research
*
So put up or shut up –
*
I realize that those who will not be honest & will not be changed; will go on their happy little way as if this never happened – However; You will from now on know that you are in error; with a corresponding reward 2Ths.2:10-12.
(Also See Prv.26:12)
*
Choose Wisely
*
PS
Did some more research
H3091
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ יְהוֹשׁוּעַ
yehôshûa‛ yehôshûa‛
yeh-ho-shoo’-ah, yeh-ho-shoo’-ah
From H3068 and H3467; Jehovah-saved; Jehoshua (that is, Joshua), the Jewish leader: – Jehoshua, Jehoshuah, Joshua. Compare H1954, H3442.
This does seem to uphold the extra ‘o’ or ‘u’ sound – however as I have said this leaves no opening for the usha written or vocalized pronunciation
Gen_49:18 I have waitedH6960 for thy salvation,H3444 O YHWH.H3068
*
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Again shua Not usha
So –
Yahweh/Ah/ah and Yahshua can become
Yahuweh/Ah/ah and Yahushua but never usha
*
Barring ‘usha’ you do have a choice within these confines
*
PSs; Also see
https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/…/melkizedeq-p…/
**************************
1.12.16
Name Evidence (From another exchange)
*
H3091
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ יְהוֹשׁוּעַ
yeho^shu^a‛ yeho^shu^a‛
yeh-ho-shoo’-ah, yeh-ho-shoo’-ah
From H3068 and H3467; Jehovah-saved; Jehoshua (that is, Joshua), the Jewish leader: – Jehoshua, Jehoshuah, Joshua. Compare H1954, H3442.
*
I am surprized that you did not make/showcase this observation – But if I am honest I must concede in as much as there does seem to be an apparent anomaly
*
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ יְהוֹשׁוּעַ
yeho^shu^a‛ yeho^shu^a‛
yeh-ho-shoo’-ah, yeh-ho-shoo’-ah
*
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ * – * יְהוֹשׁוּעַ – With the 2nd ו (o/u/w) missing –
*
Hebraically spelt differently but phonetically anglicized the same – Interesting – I am not up with the vowel pointing; top or bottom – 1st off; I do not care for the Babylonian Jewish script dubbed ‘Hebrew’ – but the *kubutz* ‘…’ at the bottom of the ‘shin’ is to have an oo sound; which would make it understandable that ‘yeh-ho-shoo’-ah’ is sited in both cases. I realize you will site Mazoretic tampering – Also you cannot cry Masoretic ‘foul’ then turn around & appeal to that very same text definition out of 1 side of your mouth while flatly ignoring the other??? But there’s a difference in crying ‘foul’ and proving it – and that in every case. Happy hunting – knock yourself out. And there’s a point – the whole Babylonian Jewish script itself is 1 gigantic ‘tamper’.
*
I understand in your rush to expunge ‘shua’ and standardize all understanding to sha / usha but this summarily ignores some indelible facts; for instance that Yahshua is foremostly valid from ‘yeshua/h’ Gen.49:18 – Some stating ‘shua’ means vain – This is not so – neither only or always. So your saying Jacob/Israel waited for Yah’s ‘vain’ salvation ??? Preposterous! And the remaining fact that ‘sha’ is not a stand alone Hebrew word and means nothing – that ‘usha’ is not a stand alone Hebrew word and means nothing. The same point could be made of ‘Yahu’ it is not a stand alone Hebrew word. It is a prefix; it is a suffix; but it does not stand alone.
*
I admit now; you do have a slim velum of potential proof. But you turn your point on a pinhead hint the supposed whisper of potential proof as if it were the Lion’s share – while manufacturing other unsustainable ‘proofs’; cookie cutting from words to be words – Yet ignore direct indelible proof in favor of your chosen pick – wish it were exclusively so pronunciation. That coincidently makes you the purveyors with the reservoir of special untapped secret (so-called) knowledge. What could be wrong with that picture?
*
Sorry I cannot give a reference number or definition for ‘usha or sha’ or ‘yahu’ for that matter because – There ISN’T one! They are Not Hebrew words. The ‘yahu’ suffix use is dubious at best and is not exclusive from ‘yah’ as suffix
*
Yet indisputably for all time ‘Yah’ (YHWH) and ‘Shua’ (call/riches) & yeshua/h (salvation) are all stand alone Hebrew words with definable evidence, meaning, definition & biblical use.
*
That being the normative; the honest cannot exclusively ignore either in favor of some other defended pick.
*
Hallelu-Yah – Reminiscent of Halloo; Yes? – (Crying Praise to Yah? – not Praise Yahu )
*
PS – You prefer Yahuah ‘yah-hoo’-(w)ah’? – Consider; Yahshua ‘yah-shoo’-(w)ah’ – Phonetically is a nice fit. AND a nice fit with all the Biblical evidence; Eh? (A) get it?
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Listen Up! 3

  1. I am new to your blog after seeing you in a video on Youtube on Malkizedek’s Corner #3. Praise Yahuweh! for guiding me to learn about the order of Melchizedek Priesthood. I have just started reading your posts and need to ask if you might provide clarification. I am terribly lost. This 2nd post, Listen Up! #3 has been so confusing to me. I have felt as if I have interrupted a conversation that I am being excluded from becoming part of. Would it be possible for you to write an intro paragraph that gives a brief synopsis of the post so people like myself, new to your writing, can ‘walk in’ and follow the conversation? I am grateful to finding you and able to add another source for learning about this amazing gift from Yahuweh. Thank you

    • Shalom – I am glad you found me – Hallelu-Yah – Sadly Melkizedeq Corner maybe a thing of the past – Ted Wilson has back-pedalled to validating a midpoint Levitical Mindset position that itself is an impossible contradiction of terms. Alienating all the other Melkizedeq leaders – What is worse he is being defensive, arrogant and willful about it – I have offered to go over all his questions but in a manageable orderly 1 by 1 format – he has refused so far. Still we can pray for him and those who listen to him.

      About Listen Up 3 – The push for the Yahusha word over Yahshua appeared aprox. 2yrs ago – (I do not know who the originator is) for all my asking of all comers not 1 will squarely engage or supply all the information asked for, using tactics instead nor will they validate yeshua, shua or Melkishua or Teshua, etc. even tho they are actual Hebrew words used in the Bible while usha & sha are not – with yahu mainly used as a suffix (if at all) but may have some use as a prefix – but itself also is not a stand-alone word.

      What is funny / odd they will not comment, respond to – Hallelu-Yah

      Yahusha proponents become either silent or incensed having their feet put to the fire to fully account for their largely indefensible position but they will not be honest or fair-minded to validate the truth of the other side – and that’s the problem

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s