Listen Up! 2

Listen Up!
*
I am posting this again for the honest will want the ‘New’ information – Those protecting a pet view will not – They will continue to ignore, write over, talk over, paste over, side-step valid facts – This is flatly Not Honest! This is called ‘Belief Perseverance’ it is mental but it is Not Honest! Saying – ‘Don’t trip me up with the details of the Truth’.
 *
PicsArt_12-29-06.29.18.jpg
 *
This image was Willy Wonka and it said – Yahusha? – You learned Hebrew on Facebook; didn’t you?
*
To all the johnny-come-lately variants that do not reflect and / or actually teach against Yahweh and Yahshua and the use thereof – Listen Up!
 *
Well at least you have the pagan – God/god, LORD/lord, Latin prefix/Greek suffix Jesus thing right
 *
Some 10 / 15yrs ago everyone was fine with Yahweh and Yahshua without much variant. Now however it has become in-vogue, even fashionable to pander to, assert, even force this as a point of contention.
 *
All in the name of being special with secret special untapped knowledge – Ooo
 *
Yes – There are variants of the tetragrammaton – YHWH (Yahweh), YHVH (Yahveh) and YHUH (Yahueh) – The point is we just don’t know thanks to the Pharisees and Rabbis but what we do know is Yah is the prefix short form from Ps.68:4 – And whether; eh, Ah or ah even Yahooeh, Ah or ah the suffix transition to any of these variants will produce a ‘W’ sound (except from ‘V’). However the suffix eh, Ah or ah is still consistent.
 *
Actually Yahshua is the construction of & means the call to or the rich (shua) * Shua – Job 36:19, salvation (yeshua) * yeshua/h – Gen.49:18, of Yah * Yah – Ps.68:4 (short form of Yahweh) – As in Abram’s name change to Abr’ah’am, As in Sari’s name change to Sar’ah’, As in the verb ‘yeshua’ being changed to the Name Y’ah’shua – as in the universal Hebrew phrase no matter what language; Hallelu-Yah – Praise Yahweh.
*
Salvation from Yeshua/h – & – Yahh from Ps.68:4 – & – Hallelu-Yah – & – shua meaning the rich call to Salvation and that is the $64 question – What does ‘usha’ mean? – Not a ding dong thing in Hebrew.
*
Proponents of ‘usha’ point to some guy that made a video or wrote an article or a series of them that plays fast and loose with the facts – that assert a construct of wish it were so Hebrew word confabulations – that completely ignore the nuts & bolts of the matter.
*
Now show me your preferred stand alone word;
*
yahu/yahw/yaho or usha/wsha/osha or sha or ??? for that matter in any verse – with the definition and reference number (Note – don’t even try citing 3467/8 for ‘sha’ )
*
Side note ‘usha’ is the sanskit **girls** name for a demon goddess
*
Now – how honoring is that?
*
See – Torah Without Rabbinics wordpress . Com – Search ‘usha’
*
(Note among the initial complaints is that ‘yeshua/h’ is a feminine verb)
*
You make up a spelling YaHU יהו. not found in the text as if it was a legitimate stand-alone Hebrew word. Complete with No definition & No reference number & No verse –
*
Some will lodge – Yahshua spelled יהשוע isn’t found in any text
Yet ignore legitimate Hebrew words such as;
*
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Total KJV occurrences: 78
*
H3050
יָהּ
yâhh
yaw
Contracted for H3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name: – Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Cp. names in -iah, -jah.
Total KJV occurrences: 49
*

Bla, Bla, Bla, Blahhhh – Some take the long way around to try and prove what I have already exposed – they stand beside a bunch of nothing – “Tell me the exact reference number with the Hebrew stand alone word usha or sha – No one ever has”
*
To showcase and elevate the ‘usha’ fantasy wish it were so word, proponents try to denigrate the actual word ‘shua’. Some will go so far as to lodge ‘vain’ from Exodus 20:7 as ‘shua’; But are in fact caught in a lie, tailoring a cherry-picked wish-it-so evidence

*
H7723 Vain
shâv’ shav
shawv, shav
(This is at best dyslexic, at worst dishonest – saying that shawv / shav is somehow shua – even if we grant u in place of v; the word would be shawu or shau)
*
H7723 from H7722 – This must be the presumed ‘chink’ in the amour – Yet it does not change the fact of H7723 Vain and H7769 Halloo – cry, riches
*
H7722
שֹׁאָה שׁוֹאָה שׁוֹא
shô’ shô’âh shô’âh
sho, sho-aw’, sho-aw’
*
H7769
שׁוּעַ
shûa‛
shoo’-ah
From H7768; a halloo: – cry, riches.
*
By definition hal·loo – “used to attract someone’s attention” – It is a neutral – Some try to say ‘cry’ is a negative – But it too is a neutral – Example ‘cry for joy’ ??? ‘shout of praise’, etc. ??? And ‘riches’ who would not want that? So this ‘cry’ is to the rich ‘salvation’ (yeshua/h) of YHWH thru Yahshua.
 *
Yahweh is not the Elohim of confusion
 *
And they said what??? “Which isn’t found in any text”??? – Don’t look now but they are hoisted on their own petard. I guess deceitful rhetoric is as far as their honesty goes
 *
Proponents invariably always comment their assertions without proof – For that’s the only way they can validate their crock-a-load.
*
Now 1] show the stand-alone Hebrew word of your choice 2] with the verse it is used in, 3] with the definition of and 4] the reference number for this imagined word.
Yahu
Usha
Ushua
Sha
Yahw
Wsha
Yaho
Osha
Or any as long as your arm imagined variant of the forgoing.
*
*Some actually defiantly say “I don’t have to show proof” – Why? because they’re in a corner and they have nothing. What’s worse they know it but do not want to admit it while they duck and dodge to save face. Not showing proof in good faith (Act.17:11); is not credible or honest. These 1’s are suspect and not to be believed especially at face value on their ‘say-so’ alone showing undocumented in-lieu-of so-called proof.
*
I’ll show you mine
* Yah – Ps.68:4
H3050
יָהּ
yâhh
yaw
Contracted for H3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name: – Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Cp. names in -iah, -jah.
Total KJV occurrences: 49
*
* Shua – Job 36:19
H7769
שׁוּעַ
shûa‛
shoo’-ah
From H7768; a halloo: – cry, riches.
Total KJV occurrences: 2
H7770
שׁוּעַ
shûa‛
shoo’-ah
The same as H7769; shua, a Canaanite: – Shua, Shuah.
Total KJV occurrences: 3
*
03444. hewvy y@shuw`ah, yesh-oo’-aw
feminine passive participle of 3467; something saved, i.e. (abstractly) deliverance; hence, aid, victory, prosperity:–deliverance, health, help(-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
See Hebrew 03467 (yasha`)
… shuw`ah
07769. ewv shuwa`, shoo’-ah
from 7768; a halloo:–cry, riches.
*
* yeshua/h – Gen.49:18
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Total KJV occurrences: 78
*
And consider what I just found –
H4444
מַלְכִּישׁוּעַ
malki^yshu^a‛
mal-kee-shoo’-ah
From H4428 and H7769; king (male) of wealth; Malkishua, an Israelite (male) : – Malchishua.: – Malchishua.
*
And this from Teddy Wilson of ‘Seekers of Yahweh Ministries’
*
H8668
תְּשֻׁעָה תְּשׁוּעָה
teshû‛âh teshû‛âh
tesh-oo-aw’, tesh-oo-aw’
From H7768 in the sense of H3467; rescue (literally or figuratively, personal, national or spiritual): – deliverance, help, safety, salvation, victory.
*
And you might want to look up and factor in the word ‘Teshuva’ – to repent, turn around.
(But then again opponents might not)
*
So —- – shua, yeshua, Yah means something – What from the Bible does usha/ushua/wshua/wsha/sha mean? Zipp0 – Nada – n0thing
*
Consider – Usha is a Sanskrit name **for girls** meaning Morning, Dawn, Sun rise
*
And lookie what else I found
03388. avwry Y@ruwsha’, yer-oo-shaw’
or Yaruwshah {yer-oo-shaw’} >>**feminine**<< passive participle of 3423; possessed; Jerusha or Jerushah, as >>**Israelitess**<<:–Jerusha, Jerushah.
So the **feminine** argument concerning shua/ushua/wshua/oshua – is just out to lunch. This after all is among the ‘usha’/ ‘sha’ proponents initial **feminine** ‘girl’ complaints about the Name based on ‘shua’ / ‘yeshua/h’. — So Go Fish! —
 *
And look here at this
The worship of this *”goddess”* spread throughout all the cultures of the world. She is found in India as the Hindu dawn- *goddess* “Usha/Ushas,” and in Western cultures and religions of today, including Christianity, called **”Easter”**. – What an Honor ???
*
And this
answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110219075731AAovnI6
USHA – *Female* Hindi myth name of a demon *princess*.
More Honor to your Highness ???
 *
(Note among the initial complaints is that ‘yeshua/h’ is a feminine verb)
 *
So Attention! – Nothing else will do – Show!
*
The Biblical verse – with
The stand alone Biblical word – with
The Biblical definition – with
The Biblical reference number
*
or admit the demon *princess* research and that you are in error.
*
Of all the barrel chested demanders – No 1 ever has
*
They have no choice but to admit the demon goddess research
*
So put up or shut up –
*
I realize that those who will not be honest & will not be changed; will go on their happy little way as if this never happened – However; You will from now on know that you are in error; with a corresponding reward 2Ths.2:10-12.
*
Choose Wisely
*
PS
Did some more research
H3091
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ יְהוֹשׁוּעַ
yehôshûa‛ yehôshûa‛
yeh-ho-shoo’-ah, yeh-ho-shoo’-ah
From H3068 and H3467; Jehovah-saved; Jehoshua (that is, Joshua), the Jewish leader: – Jehoshua, Jehoshuah, Joshua. Compare H1954, H3442.
This does seem to uphold the extra ‘o’ or ‘u’ sound – however as I have said this leaves no opening for the usha written or vocalized pronunciation
Gen_49:18 I have waitedH6960 for thy salvation,H3444 O YHWH.H3068
*
H3444
יְשׁוּעָה
yeshû‛âh
yesh-oo’-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: – deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Again shua Not usha
So –
Yahweh/Ah/ah and Yahshua can become
Yahuweh/Ah/ah and Yahushua but never usha
*
Barring ‘usha’ you do have a choice within these confines
*
PSs; Also see
**************************
1.12.16
Name Evidence (From another exchange)
*
H3091
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ יְהוֹשׁוּעַ
yeho^shu^a‛ yeho^shu^a‛
yeh-ho-shoo’-ah, yeh-ho-shoo’-ah
From H3068 and H3467; Jehovah-saved; Jehoshua (that is, Joshua), the Jewish leader: – Jehoshua, Jehoshuah, Joshua. Compare H1954, H3442.
*
I am surprized that you did not make/showcase this observation – But if I am honest I must concede in as much as there does seem to be an apparent anomaly
*
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ יְהוֹשׁוּעַ
yeho^shu^a‛ yeho^shu^a‛
yeh-ho-shoo’-ah, yeh-ho-shoo’-ah
*
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ * – * יְהוֹשׁוּעַ – With the 2nd ו (o/u/w) missing –
*
Hebraically spelt differently but phonetically anglicized the same – Interesting – I am not up with the vowel pointing; top or bottom – 1st off; I do not care for the Babylonian Jewish script dubbed ‘Hebrew’ – but the *kubutz* ‘…’ at the bottom of the ‘shin’ is to have an oo sound; which would make it understandable that ‘yeh-ho-shoo’-ah’ is sited in both cases. I realize you will site Mazoretic tampering – Also you cannot cry Masoretic ‘foul’ then turn around & appeal to that very same text definition out of 1 side of your mouth while flatly ignoring the other??? But there’s a difference in crying ‘foul’ and proving it – and that in every case. Happy hunting – knock yourself out. And there’s a point – the whole Babylonian Jewish script itself is 1 gigantic ‘tamper’.
*
I understand in your rush to expunge ‘shua’ and standardize all understanding to sha / usha but this summarily ignores some indelible facts; for instance that Yahshua is foremostly valid from ‘yeshua/h’ Gen.49:18 – Some stating ‘shua’ means vain – This is not so – neither only or always. So your saying Jacob/Israel waited for Yah’s ‘vain’ salvation ??? Preposterous! And the remaining fact that ‘sha’ is not a stand alone Hebrew word and means nothing – that ‘usha’ is not a stand alone Hebrew word and means nothing. The same point could be made of ‘Yahu’ it is not a stand alone Hebrew word. It is a prefix; it is a suffix; but it does not stand alone.
*
I admit now; you do have a slim velum of potential proof. But you turn your point on a pinhead hint the supposed whisper of potential proof as if it were the Lion’s share – while manufacturing other unsustainable ‘proofs’; cookie cutting from words to be words – Yet ignore direct indelible proof in favor of your chosen pick – wish it were exclusively so pronunciation. That coincidently makes you the purveyors with the reservoir of special untapped secret (so-called) knowledge. What could be wrong with that picture?
*
Sorry I cannot give a reference number or definition for ‘usha or sha’ or ‘yahu’ for that matter because – There ISN’T one! They are Not Hebrew words. The ‘yahu’ suffix use is dubious at best and is not exclusive from ‘yah’ as suffix
*
Yet indisputably for all time ‘Yah’ (YHWH) and ‘Shua’ (call/riches) & yeshua/h (salvation) are all stand alone Hebrew words with definable evidence, meaning, definition & biblical use.
*
That being the normative; the honest cannot exclusively ignore either.
*
Hallelu-Yah – Reminiscent of Halloo; Yes? – (Crying Praise to Yah? – not Praise Yahu )
 *
PS – You prefer Yahuah ‘yah-hoo’-(w)ah’? – Consider; Yahshua ‘yah-shoo’-(w)ah’ – Phonetically is a nice fit. AND a nice fit with all the Biblical evidence; Eh? (A) get it?
Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Listen Up! 2

  1. Hey Brother …. what part of “Show us some Hebrew evidence, The Biblical verse – with The stand alone Biblical word – with The Biblical definition – with The Biblical reference number” don’t these people understand? TW

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s