Hebrews thru Melkizedeq Eyes Seris

Torah Without Rabbinics

Part 1 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/melkizedeq-eyes-1/
Part 2 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/hebrews-thru-melkizedeq-eyes-2/
Part 3 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/02/28/hebrews-thru-melkizedeq-eyes-3/
Part 4 – https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/03/02/hebrews-thru-melkizedeq-eyes-4/

Torah to the Tribes (Hebrews Hebraically)

Introduction* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4GM5-7fYRk&feature=youtu.be
Part 1 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MdPHKe2nso&feature=youtu.be
Part 2* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9A94AqskWO4&feature=youtu.be
Part 3 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1CetkyXwAY
Part 4* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6s5RMX_WAQ&list=PLXpVLO-UE4XPxkPJk-U7vRjzeeIBg-QLj
Part 5* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-NZqsLkAaA&list=PLXpVLO-UE4XPxkPJk-U7vRjzeeIBg-QLj
Part 6* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VFx6sXULT4&feature=youtu.be
Part 7a* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07adGsH-pH0&feature=youtu.be
Part 7b* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCLOZ3MEDqY
Part 8* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpKPECTyEf8
Part 9* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu-3BCixTiI&feature=youtu.be
Part 10a* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x714jCxaIQk&feature=youtu.be
Part 10b* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tupQ431NXU
Part 11* – http://www.youtu.be/dWOXjeh3m6s
Part 12* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69FfkxXJFys&feature=youtu.be
Part 13* – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScxZUSBsQlk&feature=youtu.be

* Comments

Please Remember to test all things & all you listen to.

************************
Introduction*
Heb.2:3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by [the Master], and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;

Heb.13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty; with whom, if he come shortly, I will see you.

Act.18:24 And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.

Barnabas or Apollos

Interesting Matthew; Great potential observation.
*************************
Part 2*

The whole Flesh/No Flesh issue – Gen.3:15/Gal.4:4/Heb.2:16 – Acts 17:11
The Yah/Man mixing issue – Gen.2:7, All the ‘Son of Man’ verbiage

TESTAMENT OF LEVI – Great find Matthew – So collaborating

*
CHAPTER 5:2 And He said to me: Levi, I have given thee the blessings of the priesthood **until** I come and sojourn in the midst of Israel.
**until** Just as Gen.49:10 states
*
8:14 And the third shall be called by a new name, because a king shall arise in Judah, and shall establish a *new priesthood*, after the fashion of the Gentiles to all the Gentiles.
1Ptr.2:9
*
18:9 And in his priesthood the Gentiles shall be multiplied in knowledge
upon the earth, And enlightened through the grace of [YHWH] : In his priesthood shall sin come to an end, And the lawless shall cease to do evil. And the just shall rest in him.
 *

Dan.12:4 / Jer.31:34 / Rev.22:11

***************************
Part 4* 1.16.16 – Except for the new use of the ‘usha’ word – Matthew’s presentation of Chp.4 is good – Note Matthew has repeatedly as of yet not responded to my inquiries and proofs to the refuting of ‘usha’ (and other issues) – See- Listen Up! –
https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/2015/10/09/listen-up/

Part 5* 1.23.16 – Except for the new use of the ‘usha’ word forsaking the name Yahshua – Matthew’s presentation of Chp.5 is quite good – Note Matthew still has repeatedly as of yet not responded (Mat.18:16) to my inquiries and proofs to the refuting of ‘usha’ (and other issues – including his errant assertion that ‘shua’ [which unlike usha/sha is an actual stand alone Hebrew word] means ‘vain’ ???) – See- Listen Up! ; from part 4

And consider what I just found –
H4444

מַלְכִּישׁוּעַ

malki^yshu^a‛

mal-kee-shoo’-ah
From H4428 and H7769; king (male) of wealth; Malkishua, an Israelite (male) : – Malchishua.: – Malchishua.
*
Part 6* 1.30.16 – Except for the new use of the ‘usha’ word forsaking the name Yahshua – Matthew’s presentation of Chp.6 is quite good – Note Matthew still has repeatedly as of yet not responded (Mat.18:16) to my inquiries and proofs to the refuting of ‘usha’ (and other issues – including his errant assertion that ‘shua’ [which unlike usha/sha is an actual stand alone Hebrew word] means ‘vain’ ???) – See- Listen Up! ; from part 4
*
Part 7a* – Again – On Heb.7a – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now a couple of months).
Part 7b* – Refer to Part 7a*
*
Part 8* – Again – On Heb.8 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 months).
*
Part 9* – Who’s your Daddy? – Again – On Heb.9 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 1/4 months).
*
Part 10a* – Again – On Heb.10a – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 1/2 months).
*
Part 10b* – See Part 10a*
*
Part 11* – Again – On Heb.11 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 3 3/4 months).
*
Part 12* – Again – On Heb.12 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 4 months).
*
Part 13* – Again – On Heb.12 – Matthew does a great job on the topic of the Melkizedeq Covenants and Priesthood – Except for using the new ‘usha’ name over the Name Yahshua. While not answering for it (now 4 1/2 months).

**
The point is – it isn’t for the lack of complete fully-accounted-for knowledge – it is the ignoring, suppression, denigration of it! – To elevate the lack proof, manufactured, manipulated ‘usha’ word as name over the Name Yahshua– “Matthew even says if you know but don’t speak – You are in sin”

consider

H4444

&

H8668

https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/…/listen-up-2/
https://torahwithoutrabbinics.wordpress.com/…/listen-up-3/

 

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Hebrews thru Melkizedeq Eyes Seris

  1. I would like to offer the following suggestion: It can still be Paul / Shaul.
    Because, although Paul had the “experience”, can this be seen as more interaction / first hand contact than what anyone born into Yeshua is supposed to have?
    To me Paul fits the mold of a second generation believer. He was taught by others, not directly by Yeshua, etc.
    What about a corporate effort?
    Heb.13: 18 Pray with our witness that He comforts us:
    that we have of good knowledge,
    remembered our gift; ….

      • Shaul was chosen (Acts 9: 15) had a conversion experience (Acts 9:3-6)[1st HAND as always], went into the wilderness (Gal.1:17)[for ?], returned to Darm’suk (Gal.1:17) where he entered the Essene Community [who were based there / Qumran] for 3 years [But now if any one has a mind to come over to their sect, he is not immediately admitted, but he is prescribed the same method of living which they use for a year, while he continues excluded’;…; yet is he not even now admitted to live with them; …, his temper is tried two more years; and if he appear to be worthy, they then admit him into their society.(Josephus Wars 2:8:7)] and was instructed [2nd HAND] by them before going to Yerushalayim to seek Kefa … (Gal.1:18)

        Shaul did not experience Yashua as the Yakob, Kefa, and the others did.

      • Something I found today:

        Although the Greek version of the Epistle to the Hebrews has become the standard text used in Christendom, the “Church Fathers” of Christendom openly admitted that the Letter to the Hebrews had been originally written in Hebrew and was later translated into Greek. Eusebius in the fourth century referred to a now lost writing by Clement of Alexandria written around the year 200 C.E. which Eusebius cites as follows:
        In the work called Hypotyposes, to sum up the matter briefly he [Clement of Alexandria] has given us the abridged accounts of all the canonical Scriptures, the Epistle to the Hebrews he asserts was written by Paul, to the Hebrews, in the Hebrew tongue; but that it was carefully translated by Luke, and published among the Greeks.
        (Clement of Alexandria; Hypotyposes (c. 200 CE) referred to by Eusebius in Eccl. Hist. 6:14:2)
        And Eusebius himself testified:
        For as Paul had addressed the Hebrews in the language of his country; some say that the evangelist Luke, others that Clement, translated the epistle.
        (Eusebius (4th Cent.); Eccl. Hist. 3:38:2-3)
        Finally Jerome wrote of Hebrews:
        He (Paul) being a Hebrew wrote in Hebrew, that is, his own tongue and most fluently while things which were eloquently written in Hebrew were more eloquently turned into Greek.
        (Jerome (4th Cent.); Lives of Illustrious Men, Book V)
        In 1537 Munster published Hebrew Matthew which he had obtained from the Jews (this Hebrew text was very similar to the Hebrew Matthew published in 1553 by Jean DuTillet). Twenty years later, in 1557, a second edition of Munster’s Hebrew Matthew was printed, this time also containing the complete Hebrew text of the Letter to the Hebrews in an appendix. This second edition went largely unnoticed and was soon forgotten.

      • Thanks.
        My approach is that, having the perfect / original language available, why would YHWH use Greek?
        I can see the possibility that Shaul dictate / wrote it and Luke or Apollos translating it.
        And even that Luke added / changed stuff … I do not think there was (should be) the concept of copyright on revelation.
        The variation in Shaul’s letters infer translater interpretation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s