How could Paul say;

TrialPaul

How could Paul say;

Acts 24:14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way (Messianic Believers in Yahshua) which they call heresy, so worship I the Elohim of my fathers, believing **all** things which are written in the law and in the prophets:

Even tho Paul was ending his Nazarite Vow (Num 6:18; Acts 21:23-24) in the only Torah prescribed way – Some try to use and misconstrue such passages to say; Ah-ha see Paul supported and kept Levitical law – that includes such things as Tzitzits, Curcumcizion, a Livite only Levitical Priesthood, Sacrifices, etc.

Despite the fact that the Apostle Shaul/Paul himself evidencing;

Heb 7:12 For the (Levitical) priesthood being changed (back to Melkizedeq v:11-24), there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

Rom 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of Yah.

1Cor 7:19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of Yah.

Gal 5:6 For in Yahshua ha Messiach neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

Gal 5:11 And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased (?) [This is actually a rhetorical question]

Gal 6:15 For in Yahshua ha Messiach neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Yahshua ha Messiach:

Here’s a bomb shell I just found.

These are the word’s of Yahshua; John 7:22 “Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the Sabbath day circumcise a man.”

Note – ‘not because it is of Moses (ie Torah ie Gen – Deut.)’ in other words Not because of Gen.17 but of Jos.5:2; 5 (see ‘The Jos.5:5 Connection’ on Torah Without Rabbinics on Face Book)

John 7:22 “believing **all** things”is Paul’s ambiguous, crafty, subtle, veiled defence to a largely Jewish crowd believing **all** things that they (the Jews) would take to mean inclusive of all Levitical law – BUT – he (Paul) does not state – BUT – rightly includes Gen.49:10 – change of the Priesthood / change of the law;

Gen 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; …

Therefore it is NOT a change ‘of’ Torah to enact the change ‘in’ Torah; that has always been in Torah.

Gal 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law (defined by v:10 – in connection with v:17-18)? It was added (to the Covenant v:17-18 ) because of transgressions, **till the seed should come to whom the promise was made;…

Heb 7:11 ¶ If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

This is the true message of Paul as learned from Yahshua (Gal.1:11-12)

Yah’s Esteem

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s