About Healing

About Healing

A Messianic Pastor at Sukkot whom I have respected in past times (and still do in a guarded/metered way) for he has increasingly and consistently excused not following the words of Moses; while following the words of the Rabbis – he excuses not using the Name of Yah (YHWH ie Yahweh); instead using the name of the Rabbis; Adonai including “LORD/Lord” – he excuses following Jewish/Rabbinic replacements, customs and holidays; he allows those known to question and/or out right denounce the deity of Yahshua to teach the congregation while stymieing/sequestering/ignoring others that do believe – all the while saying ‘Do it God’s way’ and speaking of the ‘one new man’.

On the positive side he does allow discussion of opposing view points, he is moving to ‘one new man’ (all the way past the errors to the original remains to be seen), he did make the effort to form a Messianic Halakah fact finding committee that he suspended only part way thru 2yrs ago. Hopefully it will resume. He does use copious Bible in his addresses – 1 Sunday friend said “it’s the most Bible I’ve heard anywhere”. He has said that he is committed to following the Bible and not necessarily the Jewish stuff. He did lament that it “takes time to turn a ship” (whether lament or excuse remains to be seen).

This same ‘Pastor’ gave a presentation of what amounts to a ‘left-handed’ excuse for both why healing (if given at all) is delayed and why we do not see physical healing in this our modern times. He was leading the audience to conclude that their suffering was a sacrifice to/for “God” – That he also had pain and suffering “but so what?; who cares?” (his words) – That pain and suffering was a way to show others our submission and sacrifice – to teach them (a wild-card nebulous) ~something~ – ???. Telling the audience if they truly wanted to be in “God’s” will they would submit to suffering as “God’s” instrument – for His greater glory and purpose (what ever that is?).

Sounds pretty good; if you want to excuse not seeing/realizing authentic healing – If you want to explain away and obscure the real reason we are not seeing/realizing authentic consistent across-the-board healing – Not Following the Covenant!

But then he would have to admit that he and therefore his congregation are Not following Covenant. Yet this same ‘Pastor’ has made a valid point in the past – saying; ‘we need healing now, not then’.

We all must realize that following a ‘version’ of the Covenant – a ‘version’ of Torah – a ‘version’ of Moses – a ‘version’ of the Bible, is a ‘highjack’ – a counterfeit; which amounts to ‘Sin’ – Missing the Mark – Not The Truth! Certainly Not the fully-accounted-for Truth without mix. A non-obedience that also involves the dis-obedient 1-up-manship of the Jews and Rabbis.

Please pray for this Pastor and Congregation and the ones like them – Yahweh has always said;

Isa 59:1 ¶ Behold, YHWH’s hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear: 2 But your iniquities have separated between you and your Elohim, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. (1Ptr.2:24)

The original Nation of Israel’s National ‘sin’ was the breaking of the Melkizedeq Book of the Covenant (Ex.32 note v:10). This they/we have continually done from that point on (Jer.6:16).

Healing is a covenant benefit – to those that keep the Melkizedeq Covenant. Sure He makes His rain to fall on the just & the unjust – But if He does so; He is trying to draw them into Keeping Covenant. How much more so a group/a congregation of those that claim to believe but do not search and study the Hebrew Truth of their Bible or think for themselves (Acts 17:11).

Yes; there is that possibility that Yah has a plan for some; but the wholesale suffering of everyone? – that names the Name Yahshua and say they strive to keep the Covenant? (Jn.14:21, Mt.7:13-23) – But are actually led to keep and led by an unresearched/unstudied inaccurate ‘version’ (which is a counterfeit) of it?

Isa 53:5 But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; The chastisement for our peace was upon Him, And by His stripes we *are* (present tense) healed.

When Paul raised the dead – When Peter healed with just his shadow; those guys kept Covenant like we only talk about. That some will excuse to another conclusion; like a suffering for ‘God’ sacrifice?

How much more authentic from Yahweh healing would we see if we in class action actually submitted to obey researched Truth – lost the errors; trashed the lies, put away the Levitical ‘mindset’ and kept the Melkizedeq Covenant under Yahshua; our Melkizedeq High Priest (Ps.110/Heb.7)?

2Chrn.7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

The choice is yours – The decision is His


Those that will not read have no advantage over those that cannot read – Mark Twain

“The ultimate ignorance is the blind opinion charged rejection of any issue; coupled with the arrogant absence of correct knowledge which refuses to investigate what is known little or nothing about” – Dr. David L. Perry Th.D.


Brief Synopsis outline of;

‘The Covenants of Promise’– Deals with the ‘The Covenants of Promise’ of Eph.2:12. Identifying the Biblical Covenants that attach directly to Abraham’s Promise Covenant of Gen.15. Distinguishing these various Melchizedek Covenants as distinct from Levitical Law (Gal.3:10; 19 / Heb.7:11-12). And the caveats involved with these various Melchizedek Covenants – Which always involve 5 issues – 1] a Proposal, 2] an Acceptance, 3] a Blood Ratification and 4] a ‘Covenant Confirming Meal’ – Which always involves 5] a direct attachment to Gen.12 thru Gen.15

‘Back to the Melchizedek Future’– Deals with the return to the original Melchizedek Priesthood (1Ptr.2:9). Ex.19:5-6 is the original open invitation call to that Melchizedek Priesthood. When the Israelites broke the Ex.19 Covenant with the ‘Gold Calf’ (Ex.32) – They had defiled themselves; no longer eligible to be Melchizedek Priests (This included Aaron and Aaron’s Sons). They were thrust under the Levitical Priesthood (Num.3:12 / Heb.7:11-12) for the next 15 centuries until Yahshua – the High Priest after the Order of Melchizedek (Heb.7:17; 26). Reconnecting the New Covenant Melchizedek Priesthood (1Pt.2:9) with the Melchizedek Priesthood of the Original Covenant.

Book – ‘The Covenants of Promise’ – PDF Download – minimum $15 Donation

Book – ‘Back to the Melchizedek Future’ – PDF Download – minimum $15 Donation

Dissertation – ‘The Book of the Covenant distinct from The Book of the Law’ -
PDF Download – minimum $15 Donation

The entire 613 law list (18 pages) – Along with my findings -PDF Download – minimum of $5.00

Or to Donate to ‘Yah’s Spirit of Truth’ and/or ‘Torah Without Rabbinics’

Thank You for your ministry donations

Send to Dr.Dave – yst@YahsSpiritofTruth.com via PayPal – www.paypal.com

Please use yst@YahsSpiritofTruth.com through Paypal using this email address.

or mail check to – Dr. David L. Perry POBx 1111 Bloomington Calif. 92316
(Along with your eMail eddress)

Blessings & Yah’s Esteem


Matthew Nolan on Yom Kippur

Matthew Nolan on Melkizedeq Yom Kippur


Did You catch http://torahtothetribes.com/live/ ???

This is part of the eMail I sent Last night

On Oct 4, 2014, at 7:01 PM, yst@yahsspiritoftruth.com wrote: Matthew – That was powerful – You brought out so much more – In a more fully-accounted-for way – The lady that spoke of miqvah – I could hear that she was authentically moved – That was confirming – I wish/pray that more/All would see the same vision. …

This is part of His response

On Oct 5, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Halleluyah, Matthew Nolan wrote: We’ve got a ton of positive feedback so far and thank YAHWEH for you being a great part (Video time 32:12) of this amazing puzzle of revelation!
Love you my cohenim brother! …

This is the archive

Please Read Acts 17:11 FIRST!; then view with that mind & heart – Then after the Video read – ‘About Atonement’ & ‘Ezk.40-38′ on TWR

Ezekiel 40-48

Ezekiel 40-48

I know there are those that would bring up the ‘Millennial Reign’ after this age when there is a resurgence of The Levitical Priesthood complete with animal sacrifices

But I will ask you some questions – have you read Ezekiel 40-48? Really? really Closely?

Consider this augmented quote
“(The) stubborn fact is that Ezekiel’s reconstituted nation was to INCLUDE ALL THE TWELVE TRIBES — whereas the Jews (or “the house of Judah” is but a fragment of All of Israel 12 tribes – “the house of Judah” consists of Judah, Benjamin and a partial tribe of Levi – mine). From whatever point of view it may be regarded, a Zionist rebuild of the Temple, even if possible, would fail to meet the above requirements. … it may safely be concluded that the LAST NINE CHAPTERS of Ezekiel are NOT to be regarded as a forecast of what ‘is’ to be — but only as a conditional outline of WHAT (could have) MIGHT HAVE BEEN.” – http://www.hope-of-israel.org/ezekielstemple.html – Ezk 17:23-24, Isa 2:2-3;

In absolute confirmation of this

Eze 40:4 And the man said to me, “Son of man, look with your eyes and hear with your ears, and fix your mind on everything I show you; for you were brought here so that I might show them to you. Declare to the house of Israel everything you see.”
Ezk 43:2 Elohim of Israel
Ezk 43:7 the children of Israel – the house of Israel
Ezk 43:10 describe the temple to the house of Israel
Ezk 44:2 YHWH Elohim of Israel
Ezk 44:6 to the rebellious, to the house of Israel
Ezk 44:9 among the children of Israel.
Ezk 44:10 when Israel went astray
Ezk 44:12 the house of Israel
Ezk 44:22 the house of Israel
Ezk 45:6 the whole house of Israel.
Ezk 45:8 the house of Israel, according to their tribes
Ezk 45:17 the house of Israel.
Ezk 47:13 the twelve tribes of Israel
Ezk 47:21 the tribes of Israel.
Ezk 47:22 the children of Israel; the tribes of Israel.
Ezk 48:11 “It shall be for the priests of the sons of Zadok, who are sanctified, who have kept My charge, who did not go astray when the children of Israel went astray, as the Levites went astray.
Ezk 48:19 all the tribes of Israel
Ezk 48:29 the tribes of Israel
Ezk 48:31 ‘(the gates of the city shall be named after the tribes of Israel), the three gates northward: one gate for Reuben, one gate for Judah, and one gate for Levi;
32 And at the east side … three gates; and one gate of Joseph, one gate of Benjamin, one gate of Dan.
33 And at the south side … three gates; one gate of Simeon, one gate of Issachar, one gate of Zebulun.
34 At the west side … three gates; one gate of Gad, one gate of Asher, one gate of Naphtali.
– – This is confirmed at Rev 21:12-13

There is No mention of the Jews, Judah or the house of Judah in Ezk.40-48 doing anything as it relates to the text; its all about the Levites ministering to or for the people – Israel – All 12 Tribes!

Even if you have reservations accepting any of this; and would opt for the traditional Millennial view

Who will set this up? – Yahweh? or a bunch of out of order – Torah usurping Rabbis???

Did you notice the division?

The regular Levites are only allowed to minister to the people

While Son’s of Zadok & Son’s of Aaron (still Levite) are only allowed to minister to Yah

You can read Ezk 44:10-16 on your own

Ezk 48:11 “It shall be for the priests of the sons of Zadok, who are sanctified, who have kept My charge, who did not go astray when the children of Israel went astray, as the Levites went astray.

There’s a point most need to know – All Son’s of Zadok are Son’s of Aaron; All Son’s of Aaron are Levite – But – Not All Levites are Son’s of Aaron and not All Son’s of Aaron are Son’s of Zadok

Just like – All Jews are Israelite, All Israelite are Hebrew – But – Not All Hebrews are Israelite, and Not All Israelites are Jews – or Levite or any of the other Tribe

Huh? – Explained – All that live in LA, live in California; All that live in California live in the US, – But – Not All that live in the US, live in California; Not All that live in California live in LA

Did you catch that? they (the Son’s of Aaron/Son’s of Zadok) are only allowed to minister ‘to’ Yah – Not ‘with’ Yah – Just like The regular Levites minister to the people Not ‘with’ the people

Are you a Levite? If not; it does not even include you – 1Ptr.2:9 is your only choice

And there are other anomalies – http://www.hope-of-israel.org/ezekielstemple.html

At any rate – The lowest ranking Mlkzdq Priest is *never* under the Highest ranking Lev. Priest

I can say that on the Authority of (Mt.11:11, Heb.7:7)

Mt 11:11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

This is a Mlkzdq declaration – the Malakah – kingdom of heaven is Mlkzdq – John the Baptist – Lev.

Heb.7:7 And without all contradiction the less [Lev] is blessed of the better [Mlk].

Clearly the lowest passed from death to life Melkizedeq Priest ; Will Not / Can Not be under the Highest Levitical Priest – including The Sons of Zadok, The Sons of Aaron or great John the Baptist

The Levitical Priesthood is directly because of Covenant breach – its a Plan ‘B’ stand in/JV Priesthood

The Millennium age is earthly – haSatan will be released at the end of this 1000yrs – Specifically to see whom he can deceive Rev 20:3; 7-8 – Definitely not the Heavenly Kingdom

Besides all this by Torah – if you are not a Levite (like most of us including Yahshua) – You have no part of The Levitical Priesthood – from Torah, here & now, or The Millennial age.

Your only choice from 1Ptr.2:9; The Melkizedeq Priesthood – called to the Royal/Kingly/Melek Priesthood to dispense righteousness Zedek – Melkizedeq

Act 17:11 These (Berean Jews v:10) were more noble than those (Jews v:1) in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

A ‘ready’ mind is not a closed already made up mind; neither is it a gullible mind. Search the scriptures daily, to see if things are so; would tend to guard against either position. Weigh the evidence; study this out – add to your faith understanding – add to your understanding knowledge – add to your knowledge wisdom and to your wisdom resolve (Eph.4:14).

About Atonement

About Atonement

In Tractate Yoma 39b, the Talmud quotes a Baraisa (meaning “outside” – These pieces were written by rabbinic scholars who lived during the time of the Mishnah) that discusses numerous remarkable phenomena that occurred in the Temple during the Yom Kippur service. (this is over the expanse of 40yrs; prior to the 2nd Temple destruction of 70ce). The Talmud.. states,

The Rabbis taught that forty years prior to the destruction of the Temple the lot did not come up in the [high priest’s] right hand nor did the tongue of scarlet wool become white…
(Talmud, Tractate Yoma 39b)


(The lot this speaks of is) ..when the High Priest picked one of two stones,.. this selection was governed by chance, and each year the priest would select a black stone as often as a white stone. But for forty years in a row, beginning in 30 CE, the High Priest always picked the black stone! The odds against this happening are astronomical (2 to the 40th power). Or .. approximately .. 5.5 billion to one!
..the Temple doors swung open every night of their own accord .. for forty years, beginning in 30 CE. (this also 40yrs; prior to 70ce) see Jerusalem Talmud; Sota 6:3.
The fourth miracle was that the .. Menorah in the Temple went out (Menahot 89a,), .. Every night for 40 years (over 12,500 [actually over 14,600 + leap month years] nights in a row) .. of its own accord no matter what attempts and precautions the priests took to safeguard against this event! (The odds against this happening are even more astronomical 2 to the 4000th power or 500 billion to one!) – parenthetical inclusions mine


Yoma 39b – “Our rabbis taught: During the last forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the lot (‘For [YHWH]’) did not come up in the right hand; nor did the crimson colored strap become white; nor did the western most light shine (Ner-ha-Ma’arabi); and the doors of the Hekel (the large doors into the Holy Place) would open by themselves.”


All these things happened in confluence on Yom Kippur/DoA; 40 consecutive yrs btx 30ce (Yahshua’s Paryer & Crucifixion) till The Temple’s destruction in 70ce never again to function to this day.

What does all this (& Ex.29:33, Rom.5:11) tell us about the Day of Atonement? Not mentioned till after the Covenant-breach/break of Ex.32 thrust under the Levitical Priesthood? (Gal.3:19/Heb.7:11)

They Yom Kippur/DoA fasted for 40yrs till the Temple’s destruction in 70ce. It did not change the interim or final out come. The evidence is; it was not ever again accepted; even with a standing Temple.

Now there is none – What do you think? Rom.5:11 is conclusive that Yahshua *is* our Melkizedeq Kippur/Atonement. And has been with No standing Temple for 2000yrs. This is ongoing- No matter how many temples they intend to build.

Conclusion – We should honor Yom Kippur/Day of Atonement – As a Qahal Edah in Set-Apart Mikqra – We should Praise and Thank Yah for what He has done – Fasting for the Believer in this Melkizedeq age to attain that which has already been accomplished is clearly inappropriate questioning what has already been given as ineffectual/deficient.

And even for the Jews that don’t remember their history.

The Choice is Yours – But the Decision is His – Shalom

Under Which Priesthood?

Under Which Priesthood?

1Pt 2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of Him who hath called you out of darkness into His marvellous light:

Virtually identical to

Ex 19:5 Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: 6 And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.

Ex.19:5-6 can only be speaking of one ‘priesthood'; by virtue of there not being any other at that point – the Melchizedek Priesthood. 1Pt.2:9 punctuates that point in the words ‘royal priesthood'; for the word ‘melchizedek’ is a conjunction of two Hebrew words – ‘melek’ meaning king and ‘zedek’ meaning righteous.

Ex.19:5-6 are the opening lines of the Book of the Covenant (Ex.19:5-24:8). The Israelites promised to keep and obey this covenant (Ex.19:7-8/24:7-8) – they did not (Ex.32). YHWH’s solution was to wipe all of Israel out and start over with Moses, the only one that kept the covenant and still had a Melchizedek Priesthood standing. But Moses pleaded for them; YHWH relented. But Israel would no longer be a nation ‘of’ Melchizedek Priests – now – (post covenant breach); Israel would be a nation ‘with’ priests – Levitical Priests – the Levitical Priesthood was born.

It is then consistent with the evidence that YHWH (knowing the end from the beginning) called Moses up the Mountain in good faith with the full intent of the nation of Israel keeping their promise. Israel did not. So what started out in Covenant compliance to be a national Melchizedek Priesthood intent, became a Covenant breach tribal Levitical Priesthood reality, a concession granted by a merciful YHWH in lieu of complete annihilation (Ex.32:10).

Rabbinic types will assert that Levi was given the priesthood long before the covenant at Sinai – sighting the Talmud, Mishnah, other writings and Gen.49:5. As stated; the best these Beyond Scripture / non-Torah writings can aspire to is commentary. Nothing can be above Torah – Nothing! Gen.49:5 is Torah; it reveals a curse on both Simeon and Levi for actions taken at Gen.34 involving both (only) Simeon and Levi – Now; ask yourself – Self; how can anyone split that verse (Gen.49:5) in half, wrench a priesthood (verbiage that is not there) for only Levi and cookie cut Simeon out of the picture? We would have a ‘Simeonic’ priesthood also; but most don’t ask that question – most just go along to get along.

So what we see at Ex.19:5-6 is Yahweh’s offer that if the people would keep the covenant, they would be His Kingdom of (Melchizedek) Priests. This was Plan ‘A'; that was lost with the Gold Calf incident of Ex.32 that thrust the Israelites into the Levitical Priesthood that was at best a damage control Plan ‘B’. There is a huge difference between being ‘a nation of priests’ and being ‘a nation with priests’. Most of the Hebrew Root Teachers teach the cyclical nature of Hebrew – that is; it cycles – if you want to know the future; look to the beginning. We under Yahshua revert back to the original Melchizedek Priesthood Plan ‘A’. The same offer (of Ex.19:5-6) being identified at 1Ptr.2:9.

Heb 7:11 If .. perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) …

As a New Testament – New/re-New-ed Covenant believer, have you ever considered what ‘Priesthood’ you are under? What ‘Priesthood’ you have been called into (1Pt.2:9/Rev.1:6; 5:10 – Ex.19:5-6)? Yahshua (Christ) is our High Priest (Heb.5:5; 10, 7:17) after the order of Melchizedek. Have you ever considered that the Covenant/Law teaching of both the Christian Church and the Messianic Assemblies though responding in opposition nevertheless defer to the same understanding of biblical law via the Judaism of Rabbinic Orthodoxy? That itself maintains and regularly defers to a reinforced Levitical Priesthood mindset? Saying; ‘The law cannot be divided’ – By and large; the Church and the Jews believe and act on this same tenant concerning biblical law – yet; the Jews want it all – the Church does not want it at all. Have you ever considered that Yahshua (Jesus) as are most of us, are not from the Tribe of Levi (Heb.7:13-14) and thereby not eligible to ever be a Levitical Priest (Heb.7:14)? Yet we are called to be Melchizedek Priests of the Most High through His Son – Yahshua the High Melchizedek Priest. Therefore Heb.7:12 is correct.

Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

This ‘change’ was prophesied at;

Gen 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; (Prv.25:2)

Therefore it is not a change ‘of’ Torah to enact the change ‘in’ Torah that has always been right there ‘in’ the pages of Torah (‘T’aNaK – ‘Penta’teuch = 5 Books of Moses)

Gen.17:9 ‘in their generations'; in connection with circumcision – Num.15:38 ‘throughout their generations'; in connection with ‘Tzitzits’ – Num.35:29 ‘throughout your generations’ in connection with Levitical statutes in contrast with;

Jer 31:32 ‘Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers … which my covenant they brake’

“Fathers” speaks of ‘generations’ – “my covenant they brake” is Paul’s exact argument;

Rom 2:25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Heb.7:12 is not a change to ‘no law’ – it is not a change to ‘no priesthood’. This ‘change’ <metathesis> is a reversion back to the original Melchizedek Priesthood standards – a reversion back to Plan ‘A’ in the parameters of Melchizedek Priesthood Law – both Covenant and non-Covenant. Examples of Melchizedek non-Covenant Law issues would include; Passover, Redeeming of the first Born, Clean Meats, New Moons, Jubilee Year, etc. and the like not found in the Book of the Covenant at Ex19:5-24:8; but stated (including evidenced) before between the balance of Gen.1:1 to Ex.24:8 (actually v:11; for Ex.24:9-11 is the Melchizedek Covenant Confirming Meal).

Eph 2:12 That at that time ye were without Messiah (Christ), being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without Yah (God) in the world:

As you read Rom 5:14, ask yourself – realizing that death did reign, has reigned and is still reigning since Adam; why did the Apostle Paul stop with ‘Moses’? I submit and further assert that there is a very Melchizedek reason why.

Rom 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him (Yahshua) that was to come.

Most don’t consider that Aaron (Ex.32:24) and all the Egypt exodus Israelites had defiled themselves because of the ‘Golden Calf’ covenant breach. Moses was the last Melchizedek Priesthood priest/mediator until the death of Yahshua. This ‘death’ released Him (Yahshua) from the Levitical Law (Heb.7:11-14); to be the Melchizedek High Priest. His death also releases us to be Melchizedek Priests again in keeping with the original calling of Ex.19:5-6 or ‘Plan’ (A). It becomes self-evident that the Levitical Priesthood is at the very best a ‘damage’ control; Plan ‘B’, 2nd string ‘solution’ – a regrouping scramble granted by YHWH against His better judgement of complete mass Israelite genocide (Ex.32:10).

Congratulations what an honor! – Woo Whoooo! What a close call is more like it. It then makes perfect sense that Yahshua would be protected from ever being part of a less-than, 2nd best, organic priesthood. Yes – the Levites did distinguish themselves; Yah did cleanse and will work with the Levitical tribe, but that will never change the fact that the Melchizedek Priesthood was never again an option for any Israelite of any tribe until after Yahshua’s death, resurrection and ascension (Heb.8:4, Ezk.20:10-25).

Heb 8:4 “For if He (Yahshua) were on earth, He should not be a priest, …” (Heb.7:13-14/1Pt.2:9)

Conclusion – We (post crucifixion) are under the Melchizedek Priesthood – We are under all the Melchizedek period and pre- Book of the Covenant statues (Gen.1:1- Ex.24-8-11) & the New Testament Melchizedek Priesthood edicts (Mat.1:1 – Rev.22:21) – we are under none of the Levitical post- Book of the Covenant breach statues (Ex.24:12 – Dt.34:12 / Ezk.20:10-25); unless by virtue of restating the original Melchizedek (Gen.1:1- Ex.24-8-11) position.

Yah’s Esteem – Dr. David L. Perry Th.D.

PS / From – Meira Bat Yah

Heb 7:12 – For the PRIESTHOOD being CHANGED, of necessity there takes place a CHANGE OF LAW also.

Understand the differences between these two priesthoods and what changed, and new understandings will FLOOD in like never before! E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G makes so much more sense and doesn’t have to be “explained away”. Yehusha fits perfectly, even Paul fits perfectly. No seemingly contradictions whatsoever! This is important! Don’t blow it off!